TY - JOUR
T1 - Histological, histomorphometrical, and radiological evaluation of an experimental implant design with a high insertion torque
AU - Duyck, Joke
AU - Corpas, Livía
AU - Vermeiren, Stephanie
AU - Ogawa, Toru
AU - Quirynen, Marc
AU - Vandamme, Katleen
AU - Jacobs, Reinhilde
AU - Naert, Ignace
PY - 2010/8
Y1 - 2010/8
N2 - Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare bone behaviour around an experimental implant design with a high insertion torque with the Astra-Tech © implant (control). Materials and methods: In ten 18-month-old male minipigs, the last premolars and first molars were extracted to provide space for two implants in each quadrant. A first set of 40 implants were placed 3 months after the extraction and 40 additional implants were installed another 2 months later. The animals were sacrificed 3 months after the first implant installation so that half of the implants had healed for 1 month and the other half for 3 months. Radiological evaluation was performed at baseline, 1 month, 2 months, and 3 months after implant installation. Bone defect depth and area, bone level changes, bone-to-implant contact density, and peri-implant bone fraction were measured histomorphometrically. Results: Radiological analyses revealed a significantly higher bone loss around the experimental implants. Histomorphometric analyses confirmed significantly more bone loss, larger marginal bone defects, and a lower overall peri-implant bone fraction around the experimental implants. Conclusion: The experimental implant design caused significantly more peri-implant bone loss compared with the control implant. As strain gauge measurements indicate excessive marginal strains around the experimental implants, osseocompression might have played a role in the observed marginal bone loss.
AB - Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare bone behaviour around an experimental implant design with a high insertion torque with the Astra-Tech © implant (control). Materials and methods: In ten 18-month-old male minipigs, the last premolars and first molars were extracted to provide space for two implants in each quadrant. A first set of 40 implants were placed 3 months after the extraction and 40 additional implants were installed another 2 months later. The animals were sacrificed 3 months after the first implant installation so that half of the implants had healed for 1 month and the other half for 3 months. Radiological evaluation was performed at baseline, 1 month, 2 months, and 3 months after implant installation. Bone defect depth and area, bone level changes, bone-to-implant contact density, and peri-implant bone fraction were measured histomorphometrically. Results: Radiological analyses revealed a significantly higher bone loss around the experimental implants. Histomorphometric analyses confirmed significantly more bone loss, larger marginal bone defects, and a lower overall peri-implant bone fraction around the experimental implants. Conclusion: The experimental implant design caused significantly more peri-implant bone loss compared with the control implant. As strain gauge measurements indicate excessive marginal strains around the experimental implants, osseocompression might have played a role in the observed marginal bone loss.
KW - Bone
KW - Histology
KW - Histomorphometry
KW - Insertion torque
KW - Minipig
KW - Oral implant design
KW - Osseocompression
KW - Strain
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77955158369&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77955158369&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.01895.x
DO - 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.01895.x
M3 - Article
C2 - 20528892
AN - SCOPUS:77955158369
SN - 0905-7161
VL - 21
SP - 877
EP - 884
JO - Clinical Oral Implants Research
JF - Clinical Oral Implants Research
IS - 8
ER -