TY - JOUR
T1 - Hybrid Assistive Limb® for sporadic inclusion body myositis
T2 - A case series
AU - Suzuki, Naoki
AU - Soga, Temma
AU - Izumi, Rumiko
AU - Toyoshima, Masaya
AU - Shibasaki, Miwako
AU - Sato, Itsumi
AU - Kudo, Yu
AU - Aoki, Masashi
AU - Kato, Masaaki
N1 - Funding Information:
We thank Hinako Shigihara and Maya Narisawa (Tohoku University, Japan) for general technical support. The authors would like to thank Enago (www.enago.jp) for the English language review.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020
PY - 2020/11
Y1 - 2020/11
N2 - We evaluated the efficacy of rehabilitation therapy with Hybrid Assistive Limb® (HAL; hereafter HAL therapy) in three patients diagnosed with sporadic inclusion body myositis (sIBM) who were hospitalized to undergo HAL therapy. Among them, one patient participated in eight courses and the other two in two courses of HAL therapy between 2017 and 2020. We determined the mean rate of improvement in two-minute walking distance and 6 m walking speed at the time of hospital discharge. After HAL therapy, we confirmed the patients’ desire to continue the use of HAL. In one patient, we observed improvements of 146.0% and 120.0% in two-minute walk and 6 m walking speed, respectively, after the first course of HAL therapy; these values are 133.7% and 130% after the eighth course of HAL therapy. These values exceeded 90% in the other two patients after the second course of HAL therapy. HAL therapy maintained both quantity and quality of ambulation and showed positive psychological effects on patient conditions because it reduces exercise load and facilitates safety. While HAL therapy might be effective in maintaining and improving ambulation in patients with sIBM, we should consider to discontinue HAL therapy as it increased risk of falling.
AB - We evaluated the efficacy of rehabilitation therapy with Hybrid Assistive Limb® (HAL; hereafter HAL therapy) in three patients diagnosed with sporadic inclusion body myositis (sIBM) who were hospitalized to undergo HAL therapy. Among them, one patient participated in eight courses and the other two in two courses of HAL therapy between 2017 and 2020. We determined the mean rate of improvement in two-minute walking distance and 6 m walking speed at the time of hospital discharge. After HAL therapy, we confirmed the patients’ desire to continue the use of HAL. In one patient, we observed improvements of 146.0% and 120.0% in two-minute walk and 6 m walking speed, respectively, after the first course of HAL therapy; these values are 133.7% and 130% after the eighth course of HAL therapy. These values exceeded 90% in the other two patients after the second course of HAL therapy. HAL therapy maintained both quantity and quality of ambulation and showed positive psychological effects on patient conditions because it reduces exercise load and facilitates safety. While HAL therapy might be effective in maintaining and improving ambulation in patients with sIBM, we should consider to discontinue HAL therapy as it increased risk of falling.
KW - 6m walking speed
KW - Gait training
KW - Hybrid Assistive Limb
KW - Sporadic inclusion body myositis
KW - Two-minute walking distance
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85091891754&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85091891754&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jocn.2020.09.031
DO - 10.1016/j.jocn.2020.09.031
M3 - Article
C2 - 33222978
AN - SCOPUS:85091891754
SN - 0967-5868
VL - 81
SP - 92
EP - 94
JO - Journal of Clinical Neuroscience
JF - Journal of Clinical Neuroscience
ER -