TY - JOUR
T1 - InSAR tropospheric delay mitigation by GPS observations
T2 - A case study in Tokyo area
AU - Xu, Caijun
AU - Wang, Hua
AU - Ge, Linlin
AU - Yonezawa, Chinatsu
AU - Cheng, Pu
N1 - Funding Information:
We are grateful to the two anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments. We thank Dr. Tim Wright and the reviewers for sharing their experience in using SNAPHU software. We acknowledge Dr. Jeffery T. Freymueller and Dr. Kristine M. Larson for the useful comments on GPS data processing with GIPSY-OASIS (II) software. We thank ESA and JAXA for providing ERS-2 SAR data, GSI of Japan for providing DEM and GPS data. GMS-5 images were provided by the weather homepage, Kochi University, for academic research and school education purpose. The GMT software was used to prepare figures ( Wessel and Smith, 1998 ). This work was supported by a Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education (No. 20030486038), a Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University (NCET-04-0681), the key laboratory of Geography Spatial Information, State Bureau of Surveying and Mapping (No. 1460130424210), the Open Research Fund Program of the Key Laboratory of Geomatics and Digital Technology, Shandong Province (No. SD040208), and the foundation of LOGEG State Bureau of Surveying and Mapping (No. 04-01-08).
PY - 2006/3
Y1 - 2006/3
N2 - Like other space geodetic techniques, interferometric synthetic aperture radar (InSAR) is limited by the variations of tropospheric delay noise. In this paper, we analyze the double-difference (DD) feature of tropospheric delay noise in SAR interferogram. By processing the ERS-2 radar pair, we find some tropospheric delay fringes, which have similar patterns with the GMS-5 visible-channel images acquired at almost the same epoch. Thirty-five continuous GPS (CGPS) stations are distributed in the radar scene. We analyze the GPS data by GIPSY-OASIS (II) software and extract the wet zenith delay (WZD) parameters at each station at the same epoch with the master and the slave image, respectively. A cosine mapping function is applied to transform the WZD to wet slant delay (WSD) in line-of-sight direction. Based on the DD WSD parameters, we establish a two-dimensional (2D) semi-variogram model, with the parameters 35.2, 3.6 and 0.88. Then we predict the DD WSD parameters by the kriging algorithm for each pixel of the interferogram, and subtract it from the unwrapped phase. Comparisons between CGPS and InSAR range changes in LOS direction show that the root of mean squares (RMS) decreased from 1.33 cm before correction to 0.87 cm after correction. From the result, we can conclude that GPS WZD parameters can be effectively used to identify and mitigate the large-scale InSAR tropospheric delay noise if the spatial resolution of GPS stations is dense enough.
AB - Like other space geodetic techniques, interferometric synthetic aperture radar (InSAR) is limited by the variations of tropospheric delay noise. In this paper, we analyze the double-difference (DD) feature of tropospheric delay noise in SAR interferogram. By processing the ERS-2 radar pair, we find some tropospheric delay fringes, which have similar patterns with the GMS-5 visible-channel images acquired at almost the same epoch. Thirty-five continuous GPS (CGPS) stations are distributed in the radar scene. We analyze the GPS data by GIPSY-OASIS (II) software and extract the wet zenith delay (WZD) parameters at each station at the same epoch with the master and the slave image, respectively. A cosine mapping function is applied to transform the WZD to wet slant delay (WSD) in line-of-sight direction. Based on the DD WSD parameters, we establish a two-dimensional (2D) semi-variogram model, with the parameters 35.2, 3.6 and 0.88. Then we predict the DD WSD parameters by the kriging algorithm for each pixel of the interferogram, and subtract it from the unwrapped phase. Comparisons between CGPS and InSAR range changes in LOS direction show that the root of mean squares (RMS) decreased from 1.33 cm before correction to 0.87 cm after correction. From the result, we can conclude that GPS WZD parameters can be effectively used to identify and mitigate the large-scale InSAR tropospheric delay noise if the spatial resolution of GPS stations is dense enough.
KW - Double difference
KW - InSAR
KW - Kriging
KW - Semi-variogram model
KW - Wet slant delay
KW - Wet zenith delay
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33644616514&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33644616514&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jastp.2005.11.010
DO - 10.1016/j.jastp.2005.11.010
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:33644616514
SN - 1364-6826
VL - 68
SP - 629
EP - 638
JO - Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics
JF - Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics
IS - 6
ER -