TY - JOUR
T1 - Intercalation and Push-Out Process with Spinel-to-Rocksalt Transition on Mg Insertion into Spinel Oxides in Magnesium Batteries
AU - Okamoto, Shinya
AU - Ichitsubo, Tetsu
AU - Kawaguchi, Tomoya
AU - Kumagai, Yu
AU - Oba, Fumiyasu
AU - Yagi, Shunsuke
AU - Shimokawa, Kohei
AU - Goto, Natsumi
AU - Doi, Takayuki
AU - Matsubara, Eiichiro
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 The Authors. Published by WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
PY - 2015/8
Y1 - 2015/8
N2 - On the basis of the similarity between spinel and rocksalt structures, it is shown that some spinel oxides (e.g., MgCo2O4, etc) can be cathode materials for Mg rechargeable batteries around 150 °C. The Mg insertion into spinel lattices occurs via “intercalation and push-out” process to form a rocksalt phase in the spinel mother phase. For example, by utilizing the valence change from Co(III) to Co(II) in MgCo2O4, Mg insertion occurs at a considerably high potential of about 2.9 V vs. Mg2+/Mg, and similarly it occurs around 2.3 V vs. Mg2+/Mg with the valence change from Mn(III) to Mn(II) in MgMn2O4, being comparable to the ab initio calculation. The feasibility of Mg insertion would depend on the phase stability of the counterpart rocksalt XO of MgO in Mg2X2O4 or MgX3O4 (X = Co, Fe, Mn, and Cr). In addition, the normal spinel MgMn2O4 and MgCr2O4 can be demagnesiated to some extent owing to the robust host structure of Mg1−xX2O4, where the Mg extraction/insertion potentials for MgMn2O4 and MgCr2O4 are both about 3.4 V vs. Mg2+/Mg. Especially, the former “intercalation and push-out” process would provide a safe and stable design of cathode materials for polyvalent cations.
AB - On the basis of the similarity between spinel and rocksalt structures, it is shown that some spinel oxides (e.g., MgCo2O4, etc) can be cathode materials for Mg rechargeable batteries around 150 °C. The Mg insertion into spinel lattices occurs via “intercalation and push-out” process to form a rocksalt phase in the spinel mother phase. For example, by utilizing the valence change from Co(III) to Co(II) in MgCo2O4, Mg insertion occurs at a considerably high potential of about 2.9 V vs. Mg2+/Mg, and similarly it occurs around 2.3 V vs. Mg2+/Mg with the valence change from Mn(III) to Mn(II) in MgMn2O4, being comparable to the ab initio calculation. The feasibility of Mg insertion would depend on the phase stability of the counterpart rocksalt XO of MgO in Mg2X2O4 or MgX3O4 (X = Co, Fe, Mn, and Cr). In addition, the normal spinel MgMn2O4 and MgCr2O4 can be demagnesiated to some extent owing to the robust host structure of Mg1−xX2O4, where the Mg extraction/insertion potentials for MgMn2O4 and MgCr2O4 are both about 3.4 V vs. Mg2+/Mg. Especially, the former “intercalation and push-out” process would provide a safe and stable design of cathode materials for polyvalent cations.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85012190910&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85012190910&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/advs.201500072
DO - 10.1002/advs.201500072
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85012190910
SN - 2198-3844
VL - 2
JO - Advanced Science
JF - Advanced Science
IS - 8
M1 - 1500072
ER -