TY - JOUR
T1 - Machine learning based building damage mapping from the ALOS-2/PALSAR-2 SAR imagery
T2 - Case study of 2016 kumamoto earthquake
AU - Bai, Yanbing
AU - Adriano, Bruno
AU - Mas, Erick
AU - Koshimura, Shunichi
N1 - Funding Information:
We would like to thank the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA) for providing the SAR imagery dataset. This work was supported by the JSTCREST Project (Grant Number JP-MJCR1411) and China Scholarship Council (CSC).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2017, Fuji Technology Press. All rights reserved.
PY - 2017/6
Y1 - 2017/6
N2 - Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) remote sensing is a useful tool for mapping earthquake-induced building damage. A series of operational methodologies based on SAR data using either multi-temporal or only post-event SAR images have been developed and used to serve disaster activities. This presents a critical problem: which method is more likely to obtain reliable results and should be adopted for disaster response when both pre- and post-event SAR data are available? To explore this question, this study takes the 2016 Kumamoto earthquake as a case study. ALOS-2/PALSAR-2 SAR images were employed with a machine learning framework to quantitatively compare the performance of building damage mapping using only post-event SAR images and mapping using multi-temporal SAR images. The results show that an overall accuracy of 64.5% was achieved when only post-event SAR images were used, which is 2.3% higher than the overall accuracy when multi-temporal SAR images were used. The estimated building damage ratio for the former and the latter are 29.7% and 31.1%, respectively, which are both close to the building damage ratio obtained from an optical image.
AB - Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) remote sensing is a useful tool for mapping earthquake-induced building damage. A series of operational methodologies based on SAR data using either multi-temporal or only post-event SAR images have been developed and used to serve disaster activities. This presents a critical problem: which method is more likely to obtain reliable results and should be adopted for disaster response when both pre- and post-event SAR data are available? To explore this question, this study takes the 2016 Kumamoto earthquake as a case study. ALOS-2/PALSAR-2 SAR images were employed with a machine learning framework to quantitatively compare the performance of building damage mapping using only post-event SAR images and mapping using multi-temporal SAR images. The results show that an overall accuracy of 64.5% was achieved when only post-event SAR images were used, which is 2.3% higher than the overall accuracy when multi-temporal SAR images were used. The estimated building damage ratio for the former and the latter are 29.7% and 31.1%, respectively, which are both close to the building damage ratio obtained from an optical image.
KW - 2016 Kumamoto earthquake
KW - ALOS-2/PALSAR-2
KW - Building damage mapping
KW - Machine learning
KW - Synthetic aperture radar
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85021923740&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85021923740&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.20965/jdr.2017.p0646
DO - 10.20965/jdr.2017.p0646
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85021923740
SN - 1881-2473
VL - 12
SP - 646
EP - 655
JO - Journal of Disaster Research
JF - Journal of Disaster Research
IS - Special Issue
ER -