TY - JOUR
T1 - Mechanical Surface Treatments of AISI 304 Stainless Steel
T2 - Effects on Surface Microrelief, Residual Stress, and Microstructure
AU - Lesyk, D. A.
AU - Soyama, H.
AU - Mordyuk, B. N.
AU - Dzhemelinskyi, V. V.
AU - Martinez, S.
AU - Khripta, N. I.
AU - Lamikiz, A.
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was partly supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number 17H03138. The authors would like to acknowledge the head of the Laboratory of Measuring Equipment Plyvak O.A. at the Integrated Manufacturing Engineering Department of the Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute (Kyiv, Ukraine) for surface roughness measurements. Valuable discussion with Dr. Georgiy Prokopenko at the Physical Principles for Surface Engineering Department of the G.V. Kurdyumov Institute for Metal Physics of the NAS of Ukraine (Kyiv, Ukraine) is also acknowledged.
Funding Information:
This work was partly supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number 17H03138. The authors would like to acknowledge the head of the Laboratory of Measuring Equipment Plyvak O.A. at the Integrated Manufacturing Engineering Department of the Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute (Kyiv, Ukraine) for surface roughness measurements. Valuable discussion with Dr. Georgiy Prokopenko at the Physical Principles for Surface Engineering Department of the G.V. Kurdyumov Institute for Metal Physics of the NAS of Ukraine (Kyiv, Ukraine) is also acknowledged.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019, ASM International.
PY - 2019/9/1
Y1 - 2019/9/1
N2 - The surface roughness, residual stress, and microstructure of AISI 304 stainless steel specimens after laser shock peening (LSP), water jet cavitation peening (WjCP), water jet shot peening (WjSP), and multi-pin ultrasonic impact treatment (UIT) were studied in this work. Compared to the initial state, the surface roughness (Ra) was, respectively, decreased by approx. 5.5, 7.8, 38.2, and 91.1% after the LSP, WjCP, WjSP, and UIT processes. The volume fraction of ε-martensite of ~ 3-5% was observed in all treated specimens except for the LSP-treated ones. The volume fraction of α′-martensite was increased in the following sequence: WjCP (~ 5%), LSP (~ 5%), WjSP (~ 25%), UIT (~ 50%). The studied mechanical surface treatments promote a significant reduction in grains size of both austenite (~ 15-20 nm) and martensite (~ 20-37 nm) leading to essential hardening. All studied processes result in the formation of compressive residual stresses (− 377…693 MPa) and the improvement in the bearing curve parameters. The microhardness estimated accounting for the contributions of different hardening mechanisms to the yield strength magnitude correlates well with the experimental data. The grain boundary hardening and dislocation hardening are concluded to be the most influential mechanisms.
AB - The surface roughness, residual stress, and microstructure of AISI 304 stainless steel specimens after laser shock peening (LSP), water jet cavitation peening (WjCP), water jet shot peening (WjSP), and multi-pin ultrasonic impact treatment (UIT) were studied in this work. Compared to the initial state, the surface roughness (Ra) was, respectively, decreased by approx. 5.5, 7.8, 38.2, and 91.1% after the LSP, WjCP, WjSP, and UIT processes. The volume fraction of ε-martensite of ~ 3-5% was observed in all treated specimens except for the LSP-treated ones. The volume fraction of α′-martensite was increased in the following sequence: WjCP (~ 5%), LSP (~ 5%), WjSP (~ 25%), UIT (~ 50%). The studied mechanical surface treatments promote a significant reduction in grains size of both austenite (~ 15-20 nm) and martensite (~ 20-37 nm) leading to essential hardening. All studied processes result in the formation of compressive residual stresses (− 377…693 MPa) and the improvement in the bearing curve parameters. The microhardness estimated accounting for the contributions of different hardening mechanisms to the yield strength magnitude correlates well with the experimental data. The grain boundary hardening and dislocation hardening are concluded to be the most influential mechanisms.
KW - bearing curve parameters
KW - hardening mechanisms
KW - laser shock peening
KW - multi-pin ultrasonic impact treatment
KW - roughness
KW - water jet cavitation peening
KW - water jet shot peening
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85071176253&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85071176253&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s11665-019-04273-y
DO - 10.1007/s11665-019-04273-y
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85071176253
SN - 1059-9495
VL - 28
SP - 5307
EP - 5322
JO - Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance
JF - Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance
IS - 9
ER -