TY - JOUR
T1 - Objective assessment of autophony during phonation in the diagnosis of patulous Eustachian tube patients
AU - Ikeda, Ryokichi
AU - Hamanishi, Shinji
AU - Kikuchi, Toshiaki
AU - Oshima, Hidetoshi
AU - Kawamura, Yoshinobu
AU - Kusano, Yusuke
AU - Kawase, Tetsuaki
AU - Katori, Yukio
AU - Wada, Hiroshi
AU - Kobayashi, Toshimitsu
N1 - Funding Information:
JSPS KAKENHI Grant No. 18K09366 supported this work.
Funding Information:
This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number 18K16872.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020
PY - 2021/8
Y1 - 2021/8
N2 - Objective: A system enabling the objective assessment of the transmission of voice sounds to the external auditory canal (EAC) during phonation has recently been revised. Our aim was to evaluate the effectiveness of this new system in the diagnosis of patulous Eustachian tube (PET) patients by comparing the results obtained using this method with those obtained from conventional objective tests to diagnose PET. Methods: A prospective survey of medical records was included with definite PET, possible PET, and sensorineural hearing loss as control. The measurement system consists of a personal computer, an AD/DA converter (NI 6361, National Instruments), a probe microphone system for recording voice sound (ER-10C, Etymotic Research) and two microphones for measuring noise sound in the EAC (ER-10B+, Etymotic Research). Pronouncing the "Ni" sound for 5 s were recorded with these three microphones. The ratio of the maximum sound pressure of voice sound and noise sound in EAC (EAC/Voice) was simultaneously calculated, and results were displayed on a personal computer for diagnosing. Results: Thirty-one patients of 42 ears with definite PET, 26 patients of 38 ears with possible PET, and 12 patients of 24 ears with sensorineural hearing loss as control were included. The EAC/Voice were 8.63 ± 5.43, 25.41 ± 32.63, and 25.87 ± 24.93 in the control, definite PET, and possible PET group respectively. The control group was significantly different from the definite PET (p < 0.05) and possible PET group (p < 0.05). ROC curve analysis confirmed 14.7 as the best diagnostic cut-off value of EAC/Voice (area under the curve=0.782, 95% CI 0.671–0.894). By adopting this cut-off point, 25 (56.8%) and 22 (61.1%) ears were determined as positive findings in the definite PET and possible PET group, respectively. There was no significant correlation between the positive findings judged by the current method and that of sonotubometry in the control (r = -0.63, p = 0.769), definite PET (r = 0.12, p = 0.451), and possible PET group (r = 0.12, p = 0.451). Conclusion: The current system is more useful in the objective assessment of autophony during phonation by calculating the ratio of voice sound and elicited noise sound transmitted in the EAC (EAC/Voice). This method seems promising because it is able to detect cases eluding conventionally used test methods such as sonotubometry performed without phonation, thereby increasing the accuracy of PET diagnoses.
AB - Objective: A system enabling the objective assessment of the transmission of voice sounds to the external auditory canal (EAC) during phonation has recently been revised. Our aim was to evaluate the effectiveness of this new system in the diagnosis of patulous Eustachian tube (PET) patients by comparing the results obtained using this method with those obtained from conventional objective tests to diagnose PET. Methods: A prospective survey of medical records was included with definite PET, possible PET, and sensorineural hearing loss as control. The measurement system consists of a personal computer, an AD/DA converter (NI 6361, National Instruments), a probe microphone system for recording voice sound (ER-10C, Etymotic Research) and two microphones for measuring noise sound in the EAC (ER-10B+, Etymotic Research). Pronouncing the "Ni" sound for 5 s were recorded with these three microphones. The ratio of the maximum sound pressure of voice sound and noise sound in EAC (EAC/Voice) was simultaneously calculated, and results were displayed on a personal computer for diagnosing. Results: Thirty-one patients of 42 ears with definite PET, 26 patients of 38 ears with possible PET, and 12 patients of 24 ears with sensorineural hearing loss as control were included. The EAC/Voice were 8.63 ± 5.43, 25.41 ± 32.63, and 25.87 ± 24.93 in the control, definite PET, and possible PET group respectively. The control group was significantly different from the definite PET (p < 0.05) and possible PET group (p < 0.05). ROC curve analysis confirmed 14.7 as the best diagnostic cut-off value of EAC/Voice (area under the curve=0.782, 95% CI 0.671–0.894). By adopting this cut-off point, 25 (56.8%) and 22 (61.1%) ears were determined as positive findings in the definite PET and possible PET group, respectively. There was no significant correlation between the positive findings judged by the current method and that of sonotubometry in the control (r = -0.63, p = 0.769), definite PET (r = 0.12, p = 0.451), and possible PET group (r = 0.12, p = 0.451). Conclusion: The current system is more useful in the objective assessment of autophony during phonation by calculating the ratio of voice sound and elicited noise sound transmitted in the EAC (EAC/Voice). This method seems promising because it is able to detect cases eluding conventionally used test methods such as sonotubometry performed without phonation, thereby increasing the accuracy of PET diagnoses.
KW - Autophony
KW - Patulous Eustachian tube
KW - Sonotubometry
KW - Voice sound
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85098644254&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85098644254&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.anl.2020.12.001
DO - 10.1016/j.anl.2020.12.001
M3 - Article
C2 - 33384180
AN - SCOPUS:85098644254
SN - 0385-8146
VL - 48
SP - 738
EP - 744
JO - Auris Nasus Larynx
JF - Auris Nasus Larynx
IS - 4
ER -