Obscuring Fraction of Active Galactic Nuclei Implied by Supernova and Radiative Feedbacks

Nozomu Kawakatu, Keiichi Wada, Kohei Ichikawa

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We study the obscuring structure of circumnuclear disks (CNDs) by considering supernova (SN) feedbacks from nuclear starburst and the effect of anisotropic radiative pressure from active galactic nuclei (AGNs). We suppose that the mass accretion onto a central supermassive black hole (SMBH) is triggered by SN-driven turbulence within CNDs, and we explore how the structures of CNDs depend on the BH mass (M BH) and AGN luminosity (L AGN). We find that the obscuring fraction (f obs) peaks at ∼10% of the Eddington luminosity (L Edd), and its maximal value is f obs ∼ 0.6 for less massive SMBHs (e.g., M BH < 108 M o&dot;). This is because the scale height of CNDs is determined by the SN-driven accretion for a smaller L AGN, while the dusty molecular gas in CNDs is blown away by the radiation pressure from AGNs beyond the critical luminosity. On the other hand, for massive SMBHs (e.g., M BH > 108 M o&dot;), f obs is always smaller than 0.2, and it is almost independent of L AGN because the scale height of CNDs is mainly controlled by the maximal star formation efficiency (C∗ &max) in CNDs. In comparison with the obscuring fractions suggested from the mid-infrared observations of nearby AGNs, the SN plus radiative feedback model with C∗ &max; =10-7\,-1 reproduces the observations for M BH = 108 M o&dot; well. We also find that the intense starburst or the existence of dust-free absorbers inside CNDs are necessary for explaining X-ray observations.

Original languageEnglish
Article number84
JournalAstrophysical Journal
Volume889
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2020 Feb 1

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
  • Space and Planetary Science

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Obscuring Fraction of Active Galactic Nuclei Implied by Supernova and Radiative Feedbacks'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this