TY - JOUR
T1 - Obtaining pseudo-OH* radiation images from CFD solutions of transcritical flames
AU - Tonti, Federica
AU - Perovšek, Jaka
AU - Usandivaras, Jose’ Zapata
AU - Karl, Sebastian
AU - Hardi, Justin S.
AU - Morii, Youhi
AU - Oschwald, Michael
N1 - Funding Information:
I would like to thank Dr. Thomas Fiala for giving permissions to use data from his doctoral thesis to perform comparisons with the SMART results and for answering our questions, and Dr. Scott Kenneth Beinke for the simulation data used to apply SMART to BKH.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Author(s)
PY - 2021/11
Y1 - 2021/11
N2 - The quantitative comparison of experimental data and results from CFD simulations is still an ongoing challenge in the investigation of high pressure combustion in rocket combustion chambers. This is due to the extreme environment which develops in liquid propellant rocket engines, which represent a challenge for experimental data collection. OH* radiation emitted from the flame has often been designated as an indicator of the combustion zone, because of its relative ease of detection with appropriate cameras. A method was developed to compare OH* radiation originating from cryogenic oxygen-hydrogen flames in an experimental combustor with the CFD simulation results. Pseudo-OH* images were obtained from CFD results of two combustors. The method consists in obtaining the path of a ray of light by a reverse ray tracing algorithm and sampling the thermodynamic properties along the path of the ray, simulating the emission and absorption spectra in the wavelength range of interest, in this case of OH* emission during combustion. The spectral radiance is then determined by solving the differential radiative transfer equation. Finally, the total radiance is calculated integrating the spectral radiance. The results obtained applying this method are then compared with former results of two test cases, a laminar and a turbulent flame, and with the related experimental data. An improvement of the comparison with the experimental data was achieved in terms of the prediction of self-absorption, which was underestimated in previous works by a factor of 15, and in terms of radiance near the injection plane, where difference is estimated to be about 40% when including refraction. The method allows for more direct comparison between 3D CFD results and 2D experimental images collected by the optical setup and probes.
AB - The quantitative comparison of experimental data and results from CFD simulations is still an ongoing challenge in the investigation of high pressure combustion in rocket combustion chambers. This is due to the extreme environment which develops in liquid propellant rocket engines, which represent a challenge for experimental data collection. OH* radiation emitted from the flame has often been designated as an indicator of the combustion zone, because of its relative ease of detection with appropriate cameras. A method was developed to compare OH* radiation originating from cryogenic oxygen-hydrogen flames in an experimental combustor with the CFD simulation results. Pseudo-OH* images were obtained from CFD results of two combustors. The method consists in obtaining the path of a ray of light by a reverse ray tracing algorithm and sampling the thermodynamic properties along the path of the ray, simulating the emission and absorption spectra in the wavelength range of interest, in this case of OH* emission during combustion. The spectral radiance is then determined by solving the differential radiative transfer equation. Finally, the total radiance is calculated integrating the spectral radiance. The results obtained applying this method are then compared with former results of two test cases, a laminar and a turbulent flame, and with the related experimental data. An improvement of the comparison with the experimental data was achieved in terms of the prediction of self-absorption, which was underestimated in previous works by a factor of 15, and in terms of radiance near the injection plane, where difference is estimated to be about 40% when including refraction. The method allows for more direct comparison between 3D CFD results and 2D experimental images collected by the optical setup and probes.
KW - CFD
KW - Flame emission
KW - High-pressure combustion
KW - Radiation modelling
KW - Ray tracing
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85111570565&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85111570565&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.combustflame.2021.111614
DO - 10.1016/j.combustflame.2021.111614
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85111570565
SN - 0010-2180
VL - 233
JO - Combustion and Flame
JF - Combustion and Flame
M1 - 111614
ER -