TY - JOUR
T1 - Optical low vision aids preferred by patients attending a low vision clinic
AU - Yanagisawa, Mieko
AU - Kunimatsu, Shiho
AU - Kato, Satoshi
AU - Sumi, Izumi
AU - Kitazawa, Mariko
AU - Tamura, Megumi
AU - Mishima, Asuka
AU - Ochiai, Makiko
AU - Syoji, Nobuyuki
PY - 2007/4/16
Y1 - 2007/4/16
N2 - Purpose : To report the current status of optical low vision aids used by patients attending a low-vision clinic. Cases and Method : This survey was made on 248 visually handicapped persons who were attending low-vision care clinic of a university hospital during the past 4-year period. The series comprised 120 males and 128 females. Their age averaged 65 years. Visual disability was caused by glaucoma (35%), diabetic retinopathy (15%), macular degeneration (18%), and others. Patients were offered visual aids after consultation, visual acuity and field, and findings by MNREAD-J. They were then asked which visual aid they preferred. Results : The most preferred visual aid was closed-circuit television (86%), followed by monocular magnifier (35%), dome-type magnifier with magnification of 2 to 3 times (34%), and magnifier with built-in illumination (30%). Desk-top magnifier with magnification of 8 times or more was used by 4%. Conclusion : Low-vision clinics are recommended to advise patients regarding visual aids with the above data in mind.
AB - Purpose : To report the current status of optical low vision aids used by patients attending a low-vision clinic. Cases and Method : This survey was made on 248 visually handicapped persons who were attending low-vision care clinic of a university hospital during the past 4-year period. The series comprised 120 males and 128 females. Their age averaged 65 years. Visual disability was caused by glaucoma (35%), diabetic retinopathy (15%), macular degeneration (18%), and others. Patients were offered visual aids after consultation, visual acuity and field, and findings by MNREAD-J. They were then asked which visual aid they preferred. Results : The most preferred visual aid was closed-circuit television (86%), followed by monocular magnifier (35%), dome-type magnifier with magnification of 2 to 3 times (34%), and magnifier with built-in illumination (30%). Desk-top magnifier with magnification of 8 times or more was used by 4%. Conclusion : Low-vision clinics are recommended to advise patients regarding visual aids with the above data in mind.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34147158336&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34147158336&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:34147158336
SN - 0370-5579
VL - 61
SP - 363
EP - 366
JO - Japanese Journal of Clinical Ophthalmology
JF - Japanese Journal of Clinical Ophthalmology
IS - 3
ER -