TY - JOUR
T1 - Optimization of the IL-8 Luc assay as an in vitro test for skin sensitization
AU - Kimura, Yutaka
AU - Fujimura, Chizu
AU - Ito, Yumiko
AU - Takahashi, Toshiya
AU - Nakajima, Yoshihiro
AU - Ohmiya, Yoshihiro
AU - Aiba, Setsuya
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 Elsevier Ltd.
PY - 2015
Y1 - 2015
N2 - We previously reported a dataset of the IL-8 Luc assay covering reference chemicals published by ECVAM, in which the effects of chemicals on IL-8 promoter activity were evaluated by an IL-8 reporter cell line, THP-G8 cells. To clarify its performance, we created another dataset of 88 sensitizers and 34 non-sensitizers. Simultaneously, to improve its performance, we changed the incubation time from 5. h to 16. h, deleted the criterion regarding the effects of N-acetylcysteine, and set an exclusion criterion for detergents. These modifications significantly improved its performance. In addition, we examined the following three criteria to judge chemicals as sensitizers: Criterion 1: Fold induction of SLO luciferase activity (FlnSLO-LA). ≥. 1.4, Criterion 2: the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval of FInSLO-LA. ≥. 1.0, Criterion 3: the intersection of criteria 1 and 2. Among them, Criterion 1 produced the best performance, demonstrating that the accuracy, sensitivity and specificity were 81%, 79%, and 90%, respectively. In addition, we found that the IL-8 Luc assay solubilizing chemicals with X-VIVO substantially improved its performance. Finally, the IL-8 Luc assay combined with DPRA and DEREK could improve substantially its performance. These data suggest that the IL-8 Luc assay is a promising test method to screen skin sensitizers.
AB - We previously reported a dataset of the IL-8 Luc assay covering reference chemicals published by ECVAM, in which the effects of chemicals on IL-8 promoter activity were evaluated by an IL-8 reporter cell line, THP-G8 cells. To clarify its performance, we created another dataset of 88 sensitizers and 34 non-sensitizers. Simultaneously, to improve its performance, we changed the incubation time from 5. h to 16. h, deleted the criterion regarding the effects of N-acetylcysteine, and set an exclusion criterion for detergents. These modifications significantly improved its performance. In addition, we examined the following three criteria to judge chemicals as sensitizers: Criterion 1: Fold induction of SLO luciferase activity (FlnSLO-LA). ≥. 1.4, Criterion 2: the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval of FInSLO-LA. ≥. 1.0, Criterion 3: the intersection of criteria 1 and 2. Among them, Criterion 1 produced the best performance, demonstrating that the accuracy, sensitivity and specificity were 81%, 79%, and 90%, respectively. In addition, we found that the IL-8 Luc assay solubilizing chemicals with X-VIVO substantially improved its performance. Finally, the IL-8 Luc assay combined with DPRA and DEREK could improve substantially its performance. These data suggest that the IL-8 Luc assay is a promising test method to screen skin sensitizers.
KW - Alternative method
KW - Contact dermatitis
KW - Luciferase assay
KW - Sensitization test
KW - Skin sensitization
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84938125457&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84938125457&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.tiv.2015.07.006
DO - 10.1016/j.tiv.2015.07.006
M3 - Article
C2 - 26187477
AN - SCOPUS:84938125457
SN - 0887-2333
VL - 29
SP - 1816
EP - 1830
JO - Toxicology in Vitro
JF - Toxicology in Vitro
IS - 7
ER -