Abstract
Interstitial fluid movement in the brain parenchyma has been suggested to contribute to sustaining the metabolism in brain parenchyma and maintaining the function of neurons and glial cells. The pulsatile hydrostatic pressure gradient may be one of the driving forces of this bulk flow. However, osmotic pressure-related factors have not been studied until now. In this prospective observational study, to elucidate the relationship between osmolality (mOsm/kg) in the serum and that in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), we simultaneously measured the serum and CSF osmolality of 179 subjects with suspected neurological conditions. Serum osmolality was 283.6 ± 6.5 mOsm/kg and CSF osmolality was 289.5 ± 6.6 mOsm/kg. Because the specific gravity of serum and CSF is known to be 1.024-1.028 and 1.004-1.007, respectively, the estimated average of osmolarity (mOsm/L) in the serum and CSF covered exactly the same range (i.e., 290.5-291.5 mOsm/L). There was strong correlation between CSF osmolality and serum osmolality, but the difference in osmolality between serum and CSF was not correlated with serum osmolality, serum electrolyte levels, protein levels, or quotient of albumin. In conclusion, CSF osmolarity was suggested to be equal to serum osmolarity. Osmolarity is not one of the driving forces of this bulk flow. Other factors such as hydrostatic pressure gradient should be used to explain the mechanism of bulk flow in the brain parenchyma.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 944-947 |
Number of pages | 4 |
Journal | Neural Regeneration Research |
Volume | 15 |
Issue number | 5 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2020 May 1 |
Keywords
- brain parenchyma
- bulk flow
- cerebrospinal fluid
- hydrostatic pressure
- interstitial fluid
- osmolarity
- osmotic pressure
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Developmental Neuroscience
Access to Document
Other files and links
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Osmotic pressure of serum and cerebrospinal fluid in patients with suspected neurological conditions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS
In: Neural Regeneration Research, Vol. 15, No. 5, 01.05.2020, p. 944-947.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Osmotic pressure of serum and cerebrospinal fluid in patients with suspected neurological conditions
AU - Akaishi, Tetsuya
AU - Takahashi, Toshiyuki
AU - Nakashima, Ichiro
AU - Abe, Michiaki
AU - Aoki, Masashi
AU - Ishii, Tadashi
N1 - Funding Information: 944 947 10.4103/1673-5374.268906 Interstitial fluid movement in the brain parenchyma has been suggested to contribute to sustaining the metabolism in brain parenchyma and maintaining the function of neurons and glial cells. The pulsatile hydrostatic pressure gradient may be one of the driving forces of this bulk flow. However, osmotic pressure-related factors have not been studied until now. In this prospective observational study, to elucidate the relationship between osmolality (mOsm/kg) in the serum and that in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), we simultaneously measured the serum and CSF osmolality of 179 subjects with suspected neurological conditions. Serum osmolality was 283.6 ± 6.5 mOsm/kg and CSF osmolality was 289.5 ± 6.6 mOsm/kg. Because the specific gravity of serum and CSF is known to be 1.024–1.028 and 1.004–1.007, respectively, the estimated average of osmolarity (mOsm/L) in the serum and CSF covered exactly the same range (i.e., 290.5–291.5 mOsm/L). There was strong correlation between CSF osmolality and serum osmolality, but the difference in osmolality between serum and CSF was not correlated with serum osmolality, serum electrolyte levels, protein levels, or quotient of albumin. In conclusion, CSF osmolarity was suggested to be equal to serum osmolarity. Osmolarity is not one of the driving forces of this bulk flow. Other factors such as hydrostatic pressure gradient should be used to explain the mechanism of bulk flow in the brain parenchyma. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Tohoku University Hospital (approval No. IRB No. 2015-1-257) on July 29, 2015. http://www.nrronline.org/article.asp?issn=1673-5374;year=2020;volume=15;issue=5;spage=944;epage=947;aulast=Akaishi;type=0 http://www.nrronline.org/article.asp?issn=1673-5374;year=2020;volume=15;issue=5;spage=944;epage=947;aulast=Akaishi Akaishi Tetsuya Department of Education and Support for Regional Medicine, Tohoku University Hospital; Department of Neurology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai Takahashi Toshiyuki Department of Neurology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai; Department of Neurology, National Hospital Organization Yonezawa National Hospital, Yonezawa Nakashima Ichiro Department of Neurology, Tohoku Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Sendai Abe Michiaki Department of Education and Support for Regional Medicine, Tohoku University Hospital, Sendai Aoki Masashi Department of Neurology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai Ishii Tadashi Department of Education and Support for Regional Medicine, Tohoku University Hospital, Sendai Akaishi T, Takahashi T, Nakashima I, Aoki M (2018a) Abnormal osmolality gap exists in distal symmetric polyneuropathy. Tohoku J Exp Med 246:59-64. Akaishi T, Takahashi T, Himori N, Takeshita T, Nakazawa T, Aoki M, Nakashima I (2018b) Chloride imbalance is involved in the pathogenesis of optic neuritis in neuromyelitis optica. J Neuroimmunol 320:98-100. Akaishi T, Narikawa K, Suzuki Y, Mitsuzawa S, Tsukita K, Kuroda H, Nakashima I, Fujihara K, Aoki M (2015) Importance of the quotient of albumin, quotient of immunoglobulin G and Reibergram in inflammatory neurological disorders with diseasewith disease-specific patterns of blood-brain barrier permeability. Neurol Clin Neurosci 3:94-100. Akaishi T, Onishi E, Abe M, Toyama H, Ishizawa K, Kumagai M, Kubo R, Nakashima I, Aoki M, Yamauchi M, Ishii T (2019) The human central nervous system discharges carbon dioxide and lactic acid into the cerebrospinal fluid. Fluids Barriers CNS 16:8. Araki J, Jona M, Eto H, Aoi N, Kato H, Suga H, Doi K, Yatomi Y, Yoshimura K (2012) Optimized preparation method of platelet-concentrated plasma and noncoagulating platelet-derived factor concentrates: maximization of platelet concentration and removal of fibrinogen. Tissue Eng Part C Methods 18:176-185. Bering EA Jr (1955) Choroid plexus and arterial pulsation of cerebrospinal fluid; demonstration of the choroid plexuses as a cerebrospinal fluid pump. AMA Arch Neurol Psychiatry 73:165-172. Blennow K, Fredman P, Wallin A, Gottfries CG, Frey H, Pirttila T, Skoog I, Wikkelso C, Svennerholm L (1994) Formulas for the quantitation of intrathecal IgG production. Their validity in the presence of blood-brain barrier damage and their utility in multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Sci 121:90-96. Chen RL (2011) Is it appropriate to use albumin CSF/plasma ratio to assess blood brain barrier permeability? Neurobiol Aging 32:1338-1339. Eugene AR, Masiak J (2015) The neuroprotective aspects of sleep. MEDtube Sci 3:35-40. Giuliani C, Peri A (2014) Effects of hyponatremia on the brain. J Clin Med 3:1163-1177. Hladky SB, Barrand MA (2014) Mechanisms of fluid movement into, through and out of the brain: evaluation of the evidence. Fluids Barriers CNS 11:26. Hladky SB, Barrand MA (2016) Fluid and ion transfer across the blood-brain and blood-cerebrospinal fluid barriers; a comparative account of mechanisms and roles. Fluids Barriers CNS 13:19. Iliff JJ, Wang M, Zeppenfeld DM, Venkataraman A, Plog BA, Liao Y, Deane R, Nedergaard M (2013) Cerebral arterial pulsation drives paravascular CSF-interstitial fluid exchange in the murine brain. J Neurosci 33:18190-18199. Lee H, Xie L, Yu M, Kang H, Feng T, Deane R, Logan J, Nedergaard M, Benveniste H (2015) The effect of body posture on brain glymphatic transport. J Neurosci 35:11034-11044. Martin RJ (2004) Central pontine and extrapontine myelinolysis: the osmotic demyelination syndromes. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 75 Suppl 3:iii22-28. Mestre H, Tithof J, Du T, Song W, Peng W, Sweeney AM, Olveda G, Thomas JH, Nedergaard M, Kelley DH (2018) Flow of cerebrospinal fluid is driven by arterial pulsations and is reduced in hypertension. Nat Commun 9:4878. Nakada T, Kwee IL (2019) Fluid dynamics inside the brain barrier: current concept of interstitial flow, glymphatic flow, and cerebrospinal fluid circulation in the brain. Neuroscientist 25:155-166. Nedergaard M (2013) Neuroscience. Garbage truck of the brain. Science 340:1529-1530. Papisov MI, Belov VV, Gannon KS (2013) Physiology of the intrathecal bolus: the leptomeningeal route for macromolecule and particle delivery to CNS. Mol Pharm 10:1522-1532. Rosenberg GA, Kyner WT, Estrada E (1980) Bulk flow of brain interstitial fluid under normal and hyperosmolar conditions. Am J Physiol 238:F42-49. Smith AJ, Yao X, Dix JA, Jin BJ, Verkman AS (2017) Test of the ‘glymphatic’ hypothesis demonstrates diffusive and aquaporin-4-independent solute transport in rodent brain parenchyma. Elife 6. Stohrer M, Boucher Y, Stangassinger M, Jain RK (2000) Oncotic pressure in solid tumors is elevated. Cancer Res 60:4251-4255. Tibbling G, Link H, Ohman S (1977) Principles of albumin and IgG analyses in neurological disorders. I. Establishment of reference values. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 37:385-390. Veening JG, Barendregt HP (2010) The regulation of brain states by neuroactive substances distributed via the cerebrospinal fluid; a review. Cerebrospinal Fluid Res 7:1. Whedon JM, Glassey D (2009) Cerebrospinal fluid stasis and its clinical significance. Altern Ther Health Med 15:54-60. Publisher Copyright: © 2020 Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications. All rights reserved.
PY - 2020/5/1
Y1 - 2020/5/1
N2 - Interstitial fluid movement in the brain parenchyma has been suggested to contribute to sustaining the metabolism in brain parenchyma and maintaining the function of neurons and glial cells. The pulsatile hydrostatic pressure gradient may be one of the driving forces of this bulk flow. However, osmotic pressure-related factors have not been studied until now. In this prospective observational study, to elucidate the relationship between osmolality (mOsm/kg) in the serum and that in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), we simultaneously measured the serum and CSF osmolality of 179 subjects with suspected neurological conditions. Serum osmolality was 283.6 ± 6.5 mOsm/kg and CSF osmolality was 289.5 ± 6.6 mOsm/kg. Because the specific gravity of serum and CSF is known to be 1.024-1.028 and 1.004-1.007, respectively, the estimated average of osmolarity (mOsm/L) in the serum and CSF covered exactly the same range (i.e., 290.5-291.5 mOsm/L). There was strong correlation between CSF osmolality and serum osmolality, but the difference in osmolality between serum and CSF was not correlated with serum osmolality, serum electrolyte levels, protein levels, or quotient of albumin. In conclusion, CSF osmolarity was suggested to be equal to serum osmolarity. Osmolarity is not one of the driving forces of this bulk flow. Other factors such as hydrostatic pressure gradient should be used to explain the mechanism of bulk flow in the brain parenchyma.
AB - Interstitial fluid movement in the brain parenchyma has been suggested to contribute to sustaining the metabolism in brain parenchyma and maintaining the function of neurons and glial cells. The pulsatile hydrostatic pressure gradient may be one of the driving forces of this bulk flow. However, osmotic pressure-related factors have not been studied until now. In this prospective observational study, to elucidate the relationship between osmolality (mOsm/kg) in the serum and that in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), we simultaneously measured the serum and CSF osmolality of 179 subjects with suspected neurological conditions. Serum osmolality was 283.6 ± 6.5 mOsm/kg and CSF osmolality was 289.5 ± 6.6 mOsm/kg. Because the specific gravity of serum and CSF is known to be 1.024-1.028 and 1.004-1.007, respectively, the estimated average of osmolarity (mOsm/L) in the serum and CSF covered exactly the same range (i.e., 290.5-291.5 mOsm/L). There was strong correlation between CSF osmolality and serum osmolality, but the difference in osmolality between serum and CSF was not correlated with serum osmolality, serum electrolyte levels, protein levels, or quotient of albumin. In conclusion, CSF osmolarity was suggested to be equal to serum osmolarity. Osmolarity is not one of the driving forces of this bulk flow. Other factors such as hydrostatic pressure gradient should be used to explain the mechanism of bulk flow in the brain parenchyma.
KW - brain parenchyma
KW - bulk flow
KW - cerebrospinal fluid
KW - hydrostatic pressure
KW - interstitial fluid
KW - osmolarity
KW - osmotic pressure
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85074996354&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85074996354&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.4103/1673-5374.268906
DO - 10.4103/1673-5374.268906
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85074996354
SN - 1673-5374
VL - 15
SP - 944
EP - 947
JO - Neural Regeneration Research
JF - Neural Regeneration Research
IS - 5
ER -