TY - JOUR
T1 - Perceptions of physicians and nurses concerning advanced care planning for patients with heart failure in Japan
AU - Tokunaga-Nakawatase, Yuri
AU - Ochiai, Ryota
AU - Sanjo, Makiko
AU - Tsuchihashi-Makaya, Miyuki
AU - Miyashita, Mitsunori
AU - Ishikawa, Toshiyuki
AU - Watabe, Setsuko
N1 - Funding Information:
We express our gratitude to all the participants in the study. Funding: This study was supported by the grant for 2016– 2017 Research Development Fund (Nos. WJ 2811) of Yokohama City University.
Publisher Copyright:
© Annals of Palliative Medicine.
PY - 2020/4/9
Y1 - 2020/4/9
N2 - Background: The importance of advance care planning (ACP) has been recognized in the palliative care of patients with heart failure. It is necessary for dissemination of ACP to characterize the perceptions of physicians and nurses towards ACP and to promote mutual understanding. The aim of this study is to investigate the perceptions of physicians and nurses concerning ACP for patients with heart failure. Methods: We conducted a self-administered questionnaire survey with physicians and nurses who belonged to the 427 certified institutions for implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) and/or cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in Japan. The self-administered questionnaire was originally designed based on the guidelines on palliative care or ACP and previous studies on the barriers of ACP. We asked the participants the recognition about condition/timing to implement ACP, Content of care to be implemented in ACP, and barriers against implementing ACP. A Mann-Whitney U test was performed and r value was calculated an effect size (ES) in order to evaluate the characteristic perceptions among physicians and nurses. Results: Valid responses were obtained from 163 physicians (38.2%) and 208 nurses (48.7%). Regarding the condition/timing, nurses tended to recognize that ACP should be implemented from earlier clinical stages than physicians. Regarding the contents of ACP, both physicians and nurses placed emphasis in assessing the patient’s perception of disease progression. The biggest difference was found in the item “Ask patient about what has been important in life so far”; 78.6% of physicians but 94.2% of nurses chose “it must/should be implemented” (Cohen’s r=0.31). Regarding the barriers, both physicians and nurses recognized the difficulty in prognosis prediction. The biggest differences were found in the items “Medical staff does not know how to implement ACP for patients and their families” (45.6% of physicians and 70.4% of nurses chose “strongly agree/agree”, r=0.27), and “There is disagreement regarding care goals among team members of different professions” (18.5% in physicians and 43.3% in nurses, r=0.27). Conclusions: It is suggested that discussions and further studies are necessary concerning the condition/ timing of implementing ACP from early stages, specific manuals/protocols and recommendation on role-sharing within a multidisciplinary team.
AB - Background: The importance of advance care planning (ACP) has been recognized in the palliative care of patients with heart failure. It is necessary for dissemination of ACP to characterize the perceptions of physicians and nurses towards ACP and to promote mutual understanding. The aim of this study is to investigate the perceptions of physicians and nurses concerning ACP for patients with heart failure. Methods: We conducted a self-administered questionnaire survey with physicians and nurses who belonged to the 427 certified institutions for implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) and/or cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in Japan. The self-administered questionnaire was originally designed based on the guidelines on palliative care or ACP and previous studies on the barriers of ACP. We asked the participants the recognition about condition/timing to implement ACP, Content of care to be implemented in ACP, and barriers against implementing ACP. A Mann-Whitney U test was performed and r value was calculated an effect size (ES) in order to evaluate the characteristic perceptions among physicians and nurses. Results: Valid responses were obtained from 163 physicians (38.2%) and 208 nurses (48.7%). Regarding the condition/timing, nurses tended to recognize that ACP should be implemented from earlier clinical stages than physicians. Regarding the contents of ACP, both physicians and nurses placed emphasis in assessing the patient’s perception of disease progression. The biggest difference was found in the item “Ask patient about what has been important in life so far”; 78.6% of physicians but 94.2% of nurses chose “it must/should be implemented” (Cohen’s r=0.31). Regarding the barriers, both physicians and nurses recognized the difficulty in prognosis prediction. The biggest differences were found in the items “Medical staff does not know how to implement ACP for patients and their families” (45.6% of physicians and 70.4% of nurses chose “strongly agree/agree”, r=0.27), and “There is disagreement regarding care goals among team members of different professions” (18.5% in physicians and 43.3% in nurses, r=0.27). Conclusions: It is suggested that discussions and further studies are necessary concerning the condition/ timing of implementing ACP from early stages, specific manuals/protocols and recommendation on role-sharing within a multidisciplinary team.
KW - Advance care planning (ACP)
KW - Heart failure (HF)
KW - Nurses
KW - Perception
KW - Physicians
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85089113807&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85089113807&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.21037/apm-19-685
DO - 10.21037/apm-19-685
M3 - Article
C2 - 32575997
AN - SCOPUS:85088791284
SN - 2224-5820
VL - 9
SP - 1718
EP - 1731
JO - Annals of palliative medicine
JF - Annals of palliative medicine
IS - 4
ER -