TY - JOUR
T1 - Perioperative use of the intra-aortic balloon pump
T2 - Where do we stand in 2018?
AU - Maeda, Kay
AU - Takanashi, Shuichiro
AU - Saiki, Yoshikatsu
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2018 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
PY - 2018
Y1 - 2018
N2 - Purpose of review Intraaortic balloon pump (IABP) has been the most widely used device to help patients recover from circulatory disorder mainly because of cardiogenic shock; however, no evidence-based clinical benefit derived from IABP support has been reported in recent clinical trials. This review provides an overview of the current outcomes and challenges in perioperative IABP use for cardiogenic shock patients. Recent findings Although IABP support yielded no significant difference in mortality for myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock, perioperative IABP use generated beneficial clinical outcomes for high-risk patients undergoing coronary revascularization. The latest technology such as optical fiber sensor incorporated into the devices provides some beneficial effects on hemodynamics and reduces device-related complications. Summary Perioperative IABP use is reasonable for cardiogenic shock patients as a bridge to further surgical intervention, to wean from cardiopulmonary bypass, and to postoperative recovery. Over the next years, a revolutionary technology will overcome the currently limited IABP therapy. Larger and longer term clinical investigations are also required to identify ideal patients for IABP use and to establish the position of IABP therapy.
AB - Purpose of review Intraaortic balloon pump (IABP) has been the most widely used device to help patients recover from circulatory disorder mainly because of cardiogenic shock; however, no evidence-based clinical benefit derived from IABP support has been reported in recent clinical trials. This review provides an overview of the current outcomes and challenges in perioperative IABP use for cardiogenic shock patients. Recent findings Although IABP support yielded no significant difference in mortality for myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock, perioperative IABP use generated beneficial clinical outcomes for high-risk patients undergoing coronary revascularization. The latest technology such as optical fiber sensor incorporated into the devices provides some beneficial effects on hemodynamics and reduces device-related complications. Summary Perioperative IABP use is reasonable for cardiogenic shock patients as a bridge to further surgical intervention, to wean from cardiopulmonary bypass, and to postoperative recovery. Over the next years, a revolutionary technology will overcome the currently limited IABP therapy. Larger and longer term clinical investigations are also required to identify ideal patients for IABP use and to establish the position of IABP therapy.
KW - Cardiogenic shock
KW - Intra-aortic balloon pump
KW - Mechanical circulatory support device
KW - Optical fiber technology
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85054734117&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85054734117&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/HCO.0000000000000569
DO - 10.1097/HCO.0000000000000569
M3 - Review article
C2 - 30303852
AN - SCOPUS:85054734117
SN - 0268-4705
VL - 33
SP - 613
EP - 621
JO - Current Opinion in Cardiology
JF - Current Opinion in Cardiology
IS - 6
ER -