TY - JOUR
T1 - Phase II Study of Low-Dose Afatinib Maintenance Treatment Among Patients with EGFR-Mutated Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
T2 - North Japan Lung Cancer Study Group Trial 1601 (NJLCG1601)
AU - Nakamura, Atsushi
AU - Tanaka, Hisashi
AU - Saito, Ryota
AU - Suzuki, Aya
AU - Harada, Toshiyuki
AU - Inoue, Sumito
AU - Yamada, Toru
AU - Nakagawa, Taku
AU - Jingu, Daisuke
AU - Sugawara, Shunichi
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© AlphaMed Press; the data published online to support this summary are the property of the authors.
PY - 2020/10/1
Y1 - 2020/10/1
N2 - Lessons Learned: Low-dose afatinib maintenance treatment among patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC achieved long-time to treatment failure with fewer treatment-related AEs without detracting from the therapeutic efficacy. This modified regimen represents a practical usage that balances effectiveness and safety. Background: Although afatinib is an effective therapy for patients with EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), drug-related adverse events (AEs) have often necessitated dose reductions. In a post hoc analysis of the LUX-Lung 3 and 6 trials, there was no difference in median progression-free survival (PFS) between patients who had the dose of afatinib reduced and those who did not. We thus evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of low-dose afatinib maintenance treatment among patients with NSCLC harboring EGFR mutations who had not been previously treated. Methods: Eligible patients received afatinib 40 mg orally once daily. When prescribed grade ≥ 2 AEs, rash of grade ≥ 3, or unacceptable toxicity occurred, the afatinib dose was reduced from 40 to 30 mg and if needed from 30 to 20 mg. The primary endpoint was the 1-year PFS rate. Secondary endpoints were PFS, overall response rate (ORR), and toxicity. Results: Among 30 patients, 93% had adenocarcinoma, 53% had exon 19 deletion, 37% had L858R, and 10% had minor mutations. The 1-year PFS rate was 50% (95% confidence interval [CI], 31.3–66.1) and the median PFS was 11.8 months (95% CI, 7.1–21.4). The incidence rate of grade ≥ 3 toxicities was 57%, including elevated aspartate aminotransferase/alanine aminotransferase level (13%), diarrhea (10%), and paronychia (10%). Conclusion: Low-dose afatinib maintenance treatment reduced treatment-related AEs without detracting from the therapeutic efficacy.
AB - Lessons Learned: Low-dose afatinib maintenance treatment among patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC achieved long-time to treatment failure with fewer treatment-related AEs without detracting from the therapeutic efficacy. This modified regimen represents a practical usage that balances effectiveness and safety. Background: Although afatinib is an effective therapy for patients with EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), drug-related adverse events (AEs) have often necessitated dose reductions. In a post hoc analysis of the LUX-Lung 3 and 6 trials, there was no difference in median progression-free survival (PFS) between patients who had the dose of afatinib reduced and those who did not. We thus evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of low-dose afatinib maintenance treatment among patients with NSCLC harboring EGFR mutations who had not been previously treated. Methods: Eligible patients received afatinib 40 mg orally once daily. When prescribed grade ≥ 2 AEs, rash of grade ≥ 3, or unacceptable toxicity occurred, the afatinib dose was reduced from 40 to 30 mg and if needed from 30 to 20 mg. The primary endpoint was the 1-year PFS rate. Secondary endpoints were PFS, overall response rate (ORR), and toxicity. Results: Among 30 patients, 93% had adenocarcinoma, 53% had exon 19 deletion, 37% had L858R, and 10% had minor mutations. The 1-year PFS rate was 50% (95% confidence interval [CI], 31.3–66.1) and the median PFS was 11.8 months (95% CI, 7.1–21.4). The incidence rate of grade ≥ 3 toxicities was 57%, including elevated aspartate aminotransferase/alanine aminotransferase level (13%), diarrhea (10%), and paronychia (10%). Conclusion: Low-dose afatinib maintenance treatment reduced treatment-related AEs without detracting from the therapeutic efficacy.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85087650001&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85087650001&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1634/theoncologist.2020-0545
DO - 10.1634/theoncologist.2020-0545
M3 - Article
C2 - 32559335
AN - SCOPUS:85087650001
SN - 1083-7159
VL - 25
SP - e1451-e1456
JO - Oncologist
JF - Oncologist
IS - 10
ER -