Plug size selection protocol for the treatment of intractable patulous Eustachian tube with Kobayashi Plug

Ryoukichi Ikeda, Toshiaki Kikuchi, Yoshinobu Kawamura, Hiromitsu Miyaaki, Tetsuaki Kawase, Yukio Katori, Toshimitsu Kobayashi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: There have been no useful criteria for initial plug size selection protocol for the treatment of intractable patulous Eustachian tube (PET). Aims/objectives: To establish a method for appropriate plug size selection using tubal function test and subjective symptom severity in PET patients who were treated by Kobayashi Plug insertion. Material and methods: A retrospective survey of medical records identified 39 ears of 35 patients with PET who received insertion of the Kobayashi Plug and whose PET symptoms were thereafter controlled for at least 6 months after surgery. Method: The evaluation scale of PET handicap inventory-10 (PHI-10) was used to indicate PET subjective symptom severity. Tubal function tests (sonotubometry and tubo-tympano-aerodynamic-graphy: TTAG) were performed. Results: There was no correlation between the preoperative PHI 10 score and plug size (p =.157). There was a significant correlation between the preoperative sound attenuation from nostril to EAC measured by sonotubometry and plug size (p <.001). There was no correlation between the preoperative pressure transmission ratio estimated by TTAG and plug size (p =.271). Conclusions and Significance: Sonotubometry which evaluates sound attenuation from nostril to EAC can be a useful tool for selecting plug size.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)849-853
Number of pages5
JournalActa Oto-Laryngologica
Volume139
Issue number10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019 Oct 3

Keywords

  • Patulous Eustachian tube
  • plug surgery
  • sonotubometry

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Plug size selection protocol for the treatment of intractable patulous Eustachian tube with Kobayashi Plug'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this