TY - JOUR
T1 - Priorities of Health Care Outcomes for the Elderly
AU - Akishita, Masahiro
AU - Ishii, Shinya
AU - Kojima, Taro
AU - Kozaki, Koichi
AU - Kuzuya, Masafumi
AU - Arai, Hidenori
AU - Arai, Hiroyuki
AU - Eto, Masato
AU - Takahashi, Ryutaro
AU - Endo, Hidetoshi
AU - Horie, Shigeo
AU - Ezawa, Kazuhiko
AU - Kawai, Shuji
AU - Takehisa, Yozo
AU - Mikami, Hiroshi
AU - Takegawa, Shogo
AU - Morita, Akira
AU - Kamata, Minoru
AU - Ouchi, Yasuyoshi
AU - Toba, Kenji
N1 - Funding Information:
This study was supported by a Health and Labor Sciences Research Grant (H22-Choju-Shitei-009) from the Ministry of Health, Labor, and Welfare of Japan .
PY - 2013/7
Y1 - 2013/7
N2 - Objectives: Physicians are uncertain about what medical services should be provided to older and/or disabled patients. Better understanding of health outcome prioritization among health care providers and recipients may help the process of decision- and policy-making. For this purpose, surveys were conducted on priorities of health care outcomes for the elderly. Design: Survey research. Setting: Four groups of health care providers and four groups of health care recipients. Participants: A total of 2512 health care providers and 4277 recipients. Measurements: Questionnaires were sent to more than 8000 health care providers and more than 9000 health care recipients: geriatricians, physicians who commonly see older patients or work in long term care facilities, staff members and participants in adult day care, patients in outpatient geriatric clinics, family members of patients with dementia, and community-dwelling older adults. The questionnaire asked the subjects to rank 12 measures of health care outcomes. Results: The mean response rate was 49%. All health care provider groups considered "improvement of quality of life" the most important. In contrast, in health care recipient groups, "effective treatment of illness," "improvement of physical function," and "reduction of carer burden" were given high priority, whereas "improvement of quality of life" was perceived as less important. All the groups, including health care providers and recipients, ranked "reduction of mortality" the least important, followed by "avoiding institutional care." Stratification analysis showed that the results did not differ by sex, nursing care level, or the existence of relatives who required nursing care, whereas age slightly influenced the order of high-ranked measures.
AB - Objectives: Physicians are uncertain about what medical services should be provided to older and/or disabled patients. Better understanding of health outcome prioritization among health care providers and recipients may help the process of decision- and policy-making. For this purpose, surveys were conducted on priorities of health care outcomes for the elderly. Design: Survey research. Setting: Four groups of health care providers and four groups of health care recipients. Participants: A total of 2512 health care providers and 4277 recipients. Measurements: Questionnaires were sent to more than 8000 health care providers and more than 9000 health care recipients: geriatricians, physicians who commonly see older patients or work in long term care facilities, staff members and participants in adult day care, patients in outpatient geriatric clinics, family members of patients with dementia, and community-dwelling older adults. The questionnaire asked the subjects to rank 12 measures of health care outcomes. Results: The mean response rate was 49%. All health care provider groups considered "improvement of quality of life" the most important. In contrast, in health care recipient groups, "effective treatment of illness," "improvement of physical function," and "reduction of carer burden" were given high priority, whereas "improvement of quality of life" was perceived as less important. All the groups, including health care providers and recipients, ranked "reduction of mortality" the least important, followed by "avoiding institutional care." Stratification analysis showed that the results did not differ by sex, nursing care level, or the existence of relatives who required nursing care, whereas age slightly influenced the order of high-ranked measures.
KW - Geriatrics
KW - Health care policy
KW - Quality of care
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84879606028&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84879606028&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jamda.2013.01.009
DO - 10.1016/j.jamda.2013.01.009
M3 - Article
C2 - 23415841
AN - SCOPUS:84879606028
SN - 1525-8610
VL - 14
SP - 479
EP - 484
JO - Journal of the American Medical Directors Association
JF - Journal of the American Medical Directors Association
IS - 7
ER -