TY - JOUR
T1 - Prognostic Factors and Efficacy of First-Line Chemotherapy in Patients with Advanced Thymic Carcinoma
T2 - A Retrospective Analysis of 286 Patients from NEJ023 Study
AU - North East Japan Study Group
AU - Ko, Ryo
AU - Shukuya, Takehito
AU - Okuma, Yusuke
AU - Tateishi, Kazunari
AU - Imai, Hisao
AU - Iwasawa, Shunichiro
AU - Miyauchi, Eisaku
AU - Fujiwara, Akiko
AU - Sugiyama, Tomohide
AU - Azuma, Keisuke
AU - Muraki, Keiko
AU - Yamasaki, Masahiro
AU - Tanaka, Hisashi
AU - Takashima, Yuta
AU - Soda, Sayo
AU - Ishimoto, Osamu
AU - Koyama, Nobuyuki
AU - Morita, Satoshi
AU - Kobayashi, Kunihiko
AU - Nukiwa, Toshihiro
AU - Takahashi, Kazuhisa
N1 - Funding Information:
This study was funded by Department of Respiratory Medicine, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine. This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Publisher Copyright:
© AlphaMed Press 2018
PY - 2018/10/1
Y1 - 2018/10/1
N2 - Background: The prognostic factors and the efficacy of first-line chemotherapy remain unclear in patients with advanced thymic carcinoma. Materials and Methods: We conducted a multi-institutional retrospective study named NEJ023 for patients with advanced thymic carcinoma. All patients without any indication of curative treatment were treated with chemotherapy from 1995 to 2014 at 40 institutions of the North East Japan Study Group. Results: A total of 286 patients with advanced thymic carcinoma were analyzed. First-line chemotherapy included platinum-based doublets in 62.2% of the patients, monotherapy in 3.5%, and other multidrug chemotherapy (e.g., cisplatin, doxorubicin, vincristine, and cyclophosphamide [ADOC]) in 34.3%. The median follow-up period was 55.5 months, and the median overall survival (OS) from the start of first-line chemotherapy was 30.7 months (95% confidence interval, 25.9–35.9 months). There was no significant difference in OS among different first-line chemotherapy regimens (e.g., between carboplatin/paclitaxel and ADOC, median OS: 27.8 vs. 29.9 months). Masaoka-Koga stage IVa and volume reduction surgery were favorable prognostic factors for OS in the multivariate analysis using the Cox proportional hazards model. Conclusion: The efficacy of each first-line chemotherapy regimen for advanced thymic carcinoma did not vary significantly. Our results might support the adequacy of the use of carboplatin/paclitaxel as first-line chemotherapy for these patients. Implications for Practice: Because of its rarity, there is limited information about prognostic factors and efficacy of chemotherapy in patients with advanced thymic carcinoma. This is the largest data set for those patients treated with chemotherapy. This study suggests there is no significant difference in efficacy between carboplatin/paclitaxel and cisplatin/doxorubicin/vincristine/cyclophosphamide for advanced thymic carcinoma. This result can support the adequacy of the selection of platinum doublets as treatment for those patients, rather than anthracycline-based multidrug regimen.
AB - Background: The prognostic factors and the efficacy of first-line chemotherapy remain unclear in patients with advanced thymic carcinoma. Materials and Methods: We conducted a multi-institutional retrospective study named NEJ023 for patients with advanced thymic carcinoma. All patients without any indication of curative treatment were treated with chemotherapy from 1995 to 2014 at 40 institutions of the North East Japan Study Group. Results: A total of 286 patients with advanced thymic carcinoma were analyzed. First-line chemotherapy included platinum-based doublets in 62.2% of the patients, monotherapy in 3.5%, and other multidrug chemotherapy (e.g., cisplatin, doxorubicin, vincristine, and cyclophosphamide [ADOC]) in 34.3%. The median follow-up period was 55.5 months, and the median overall survival (OS) from the start of first-line chemotherapy was 30.7 months (95% confidence interval, 25.9–35.9 months). There was no significant difference in OS among different first-line chemotherapy regimens (e.g., between carboplatin/paclitaxel and ADOC, median OS: 27.8 vs. 29.9 months). Masaoka-Koga stage IVa and volume reduction surgery were favorable prognostic factors for OS in the multivariate analysis using the Cox proportional hazards model. Conclusion: The efficacy of each first-line chemotherapy regimen for advanced thymic carcinoma did not vary significantly. Our results might support the adequacy of the use of carboplatin/paclitaxel as first-line chemotherapy for these patients. Implications for Practice: Because of its rarity, there is limited information about prognostic factors and efficacy of chemotherapy in patients with advanced thymic carcinoma. This is the largest data set for those patients treated with chemotherapy. This study suggests there is no significant difference in efficacy between carboplatin/paclitaxel and cisplatin/doxorubicin/vincristine/cyclophosphamide for advanced thymic carcinoma. This result can support the adequacy of the selection of platinum doublets as treatment for those patients, rather than anthracycline-based multidrug regimen.
KW - Chemotherapy
KW - Masaoka-Koga stage
KW - Thymic carcinoma
KW - Volume reduction surgery
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85044277618&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85044277618&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1634/theoncologist.2017-0586
DO - 10.1634/theoncologist.2017-0586
M3 - Article
C2 - 29567820
AN - SCOPUS:85044277618
SN - 1083-7159
VL - 23
SP - 1210
EP - 1217
JO - Oncologist
JF - Oncologist
IS - 10
ER -