TY - JOUR
T1 - Prognostic impact of intraoperative peritoneal cytology after neoadjuvant therapy for potentially resectable pancreatic cancer
AU - Aoki, Shuichi
AU - Mizuma, Masamichi
AU - Hayashi, Hiroki
AU - Yoshimachi, Shingo
AU - Hata, Tatsuo
AU - Miura, Takayuki
AU - Takadate, Tatsuyuki
AU - Maeda, Shimpei
AU - Ariake, Kyohei
AU - Kawaguchi, Kei
AU - Masuda, Kunihiro
AU - Ishida, Masaharu
AU - Ohtsuka, Hideo
AU - Nakagawa, Kei
AU - Morikawa, Takanori
AU - Motoi, Fuyuhiko
AU - Unno, Michiaki
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors would like to express their deep gratitude to all surgeons who performed NAT and pancreatectomies at our institutions. They also thank the all radiologists and technologists in Department of Diagnostic radiology, Tohoku University Hospital. This study was supported by no research grant. The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding this research.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 IAP and EPC
PY - 2020/12
Y1 - 2020/12
N2 - Background: Neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) is considered a potential approach to improve survival for patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PA). The objective of this study was to identify the clinical implications of washing peritoneal cytology (CY) status after NAT. Methods: Between 2005 and 2016, 151 consecutive patients with resectable (R)/borderline resectable (BR) PA underwent NAT with intention of subsequent resection at our institution. Of them, 13 and 123 patients underwent pancreatectomies with positive (CY+) and negative (CY-) cytology, respectively, while the remaining 15 patients did not undergo resection due to gross metastases at laparotomy. The clinicopathological factors influencing overall survival were clarified by the uni- and multivariate analyses. Results: The postoperative overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were markedly worse in patients who underwent resection with CY+, compared with those who were CY- (median OS, 14.8 m vs 30.8 m, p = 0.026, and median DFS 6.0 m vs 15.1 m, p = 0.008). According to the resectability by NCCN guidelines, CY+ indicates worse prognosis than CY- in R-PA patients (mOS: 30.1 m vs 71.1 m: p = 0.080). Similarly, in BR-PA patients, CY+ showed the significantly worse prognosis than CY- (mOS: 13.8 m vs 24.5 m: p = 0.048), which prognosis is comparable with patients who did not undergo resection. The multivariate analysis revealed that resectability, CY status and the induction of adjuvant therapy were significant predictors of postoperative OS (p = 0.007: Hazard ratio 2.264, 0.040:2.094 and 0.002:3.246, respectively). Conclusions: CY+ is a significant predictor of poorer prognosis in PA patients after NAT. The subsequent pancreatectomies with CY+ after NAT do not contribute to prolonged survival.
AB - Background: Neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) is considered a potential approach to improve survival for patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PA). The objective of this study was to identify the clinical implications of washing peritoneal cytology (CY) status after NAT. Methods: Between 2005 and 2016, 151 consecutive patients with resectable (R)/borderline resectable (BR) PA underwent NAT with intention of subsequent resection at our institution. Of them, 13 and 123 patients underwent pancreatectomies with positive (CY+) and negative (CY-) cytology, respectively, while the remaining 15 patients did not undergo resection due to gross metastases at laparotomy. The clinicopathological factors influencing overall survival were clarified by the uni- and multivariate analyses. Results: The postoperative overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were markedly worse in patients who underwent resection with CY+, compared with those who were CY- (median OS, 14.8 m vs 30.8 m, p = 0.026, and median DFS 6.0 m vs 15.1 m, p = 0.008). According to the resectability by NCCN guidelines, CY+ indicates worse prognosis than CY- in R-PA patients (mOS: 30.1 m vs 71.1 m: p = 0.080). Similarly, in BR-PA patients, CY+ showed the significantly worse prognosis than CY- (mOS: 13.8 m vs 24.5 m: p = 0.048), which prognosis is comparable with patients who did not undergo resection. The multivariate analysis revealed that resectability, CY status and the induction of adjuvant therapy were significant predictors of postoperative OS (p = 0.007: Hazard ratio 2.264, 0.040:2.094 and 0.002:3.246, respectively). Conclusions: CY+ is a significant predictor of poorer prognosis in PA patients after NAT. The subsequent pancreatectomies with CY+ after NAT do not contribute to prolonged survival.
KW - Neoadjuvant therapy
KW - Pancreas cancer
KW - Peritoneal washing cytology
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85092082596&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85092082596&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.pan.2020.08.022
DO - 10.1016/j.pan.2020.08.022
M3 - Article
C2 - 33032923
AN - SCOPUS:85092082596
SN - 1424-3903
VL - 20
SP - 1711
EP - 1717
JO - Pancreatology
JF - Pancreatology
IS - 8
ER -