TY - JOUR
T1 - Prognostic value of end-of-induction PET response after first-line immunochemotherapy for follicular lymphoma (GALLIUM)
T2 - secondary analysis of a randomised, phase 3 trial
AU - PET investigators from the GALLIUM study
AU - Trotman, Judith
AU - Barrington, Sally F.
AU - Belada, David
AU - Meignan, Michel
AU - MacEwan, Robert
AU - Owen, Carolyn
AU - Ptáčník, Václav
AU - Rosta, András
AU - Fingerle-Rowson, Günter R.
AU - Zhu, Jiawen
AU - Nielsen, Tina
AU - Sahin, Deniz
AU - Hiddemann, Wolfgang
AU - Marcus, Robert E.
AU - Davies, Andrew
AU - Hertzberg, Mark
AU - Grigg, Andrew
AU - Cannell, Paul
AU - Quach, Hang
AU - Opat, Stephen
AU - Tam, Constantine
AU - Marlton, Paula
AU - Janssens, Ann
AU - Offner, Fritz
AU - Van eygen, Koen
AU - Sangha, Randeep
AU - Mckay, Pam
AU - Wilson, Jonathan
AU - Van Der Jagt, Richard
AU - Roitman, Daryl
AU - Trneny, Marek
AU - Mayer, Jiri
AU - Le Du, Katell
AU - Solal-Celigny, Philippe
AU - Cartron, Guillaume
AU - Foussard, Charles
AU - Frickhofen, Norbert
AU - Schmidt, Peter
AU - Graeven, Ullrich
AU - Gaska, Tobias
AU - Schlag, Rudolf
AU - Sökler, Martin
AU - Prange-Krex, Gabriele
AU - Florschütz, Axel
AU - Lindemann, Hans Walter
AU - Schimmelpfennig, Christoph
AU - Tonndorf, Solveig
AU - Hänel, Mathias
AU - Ishizawa, Kenichi
AU - Ichikawa, Satoshi
N1 - Funding Information:
JT reports no financial interests; she reports unremunerated participation in Roche, Celgene, Janssen, and Takeda advisory boards. SFB has received research funding from AstraZeneca, Hermes Medical Solutions, and Siemens, and has received fees for healthcare consultancy from Roche Pharmaceuticals. DB has participated in advisory boards for Roche, Janssen-Cilag, and Gilead Sciences, and has received travel grants from Roche and Gilead Sciences. MM has provided unremunerated consultancy for Roche Pharmaceuticals, and has received honoraria for lectures and preparation of educational materials from Roche China. CO has received honoraria from F Hoffmann-La Roche, Lundbeck, AbbVie, Merck, Janssen, Gilead, and AstraZeneca. VP has received honoraria from F Hoffmann-La Roche, and personal fees from Quintiles Eastern Holdings Gmb, Janssen-Cilag, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and F Hoffmann-La Roche. JZ and DS are employed by F Hoffmann-La Roche. GRF-R and TN are employed by and own stock in F Hoffmann-La Roche. WH has received consultancy fees, research funding, and honoraria from F Hoffmann-La Roche, Janssen, and Gilead. REM has received research funding, travel support, and honoraria for advisory boards and lectures from F Hoffmann-La Roche. AD has received research support from Roche, Celgene, Gilead, Takeda, GlaxoSmithKline, Bayer, Janssen, Karyopharma, Pfizer, Acerta, and MSD; has attended advisory boards for Roche, Celgene, Gilead, Takeda, CTI, Mundipharma, and Karyopharma; has received honoraria from Roche, Celgene, Gilead, Takeda, CTI, Mundipharma, Janssen, and Pfizer; and has received support for travel to scientific conferences from Roche, Takeda, CTI, and Mundipharma. RM and AR declare no competing interests.
Funding Information:
GALLIUM is sponsored by F Hoffmann-La Roche. We thank the patients, investigators, and study nurses, and PET centres taking part in GALLIUM. The first draft was written by JT; additional writing assistance was provided by Lynda McEvoy and Louise Profit (Gardiner-Caldwell Communications, Macclesfield, UK), funded by F Hoffmann-La Roche. SFB acknowledges support from the National Institute of Health Research (NIHR; RP-2-16-07-001). King's College London and UCL Comprehensive Cancer Imaging Centre is funded by the Cancer Research UK and Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council in association with the Medical Research Council and Department of Health (England). The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the National Health Service, the National Institute of Health Research, or the Department of Health.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2018/11
Y1 - 2018/11
N2 - Background: Initial results from the ongoing GALLIUM trial have shown that patients with follicular lymphoma have a longer progression-free survival after first-line immunochemotherapy with obinutuzumab than with rituximab. The aim of this secondary analysis was to evaluate the prognostic value of PET–CT responses after first-line immunochemotherapy in the GALLIUM study. Methods: GALLIUM is an open-label, parallel-group randomised, phase 3 trial, which recruited previously untreated patients with CD20-positive follicular lymphoma (grades 1–3a; disease stage III/IV, or stage II with largest tumour diameter ≥7 cm) who were aged 18 years or older and met the criteria for needing treatment. Eligible patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive intravenous administration of obinutuzumab (1000 mg on days 1, 8, and 15 of cycle 1, then day 1 of subsequent cycles) or rituximab (375 mg/m2 on day 1 of each cycle), in six 21-day cycles with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (known as CHOP; oral administration) followed by two 21-day cycles of antibody alone, or eight 21-day cycles cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and prednisone (known as CVP; oral administration), or six 28-day cycles with bendamustine, followed by maintenance antibody every 2 months for up to 2 years. The primary endpoint of the trial, investigator-assessed progression-free survival, has been reported previously. This secondary analysis reports PET and CT-based responses at end-of-induction therapy and explains their relation with progression-free and overall survival outcomes in patients with available scans. As per protocol, during the trial, PET scans (mandatory in the first 170 patients enrolled at sites with available PET facilities, and optional thereafter), acquired at baseline and end of induction (PET population), were assessed prospectively by investigators and an independent review committee (IRC) applying International Harmonisation Project (IHP) 2007 response criteria, and retrospectively by the IRC only applying current Lugano 2014 response criteria. IRC members (but not study investigators) were masked to treatment and clinical outcome when assessing response. The landmark analyses excluded patients who died or progressed (contrast enhanced CT-based assessment of progressive disease, or started next anti-lymphoma treatment) before or at end of induction. GALLIUM is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01332968. Findings: 1202 patients were enrolled in GALLIUM between July 6, 2011, and Feb 4, 2014, of whom 595 were included in the PET population; 533 (IHP 2007; prospective analysis), and 508 (Lugano 2014; retrospective analysis) were analysed for progression-free survival (landmark analysis). At end of induction, 390 of 595 patients (65·5% [95% CI 61·6–69·4]) achieved PET complete response according to IHP 2007 criteria, and 450 (75·6% [95% CI 72·0–79·0]) obtained PET complete metabolic response according to Lugano 2014 criteria. With a median of 43·3 months of observation (IQR 36·2–51·8), 2·5-year progression-free survival from end of induction was 87·8% (95% CI 83·9–90·8) in PET complete responders and 72·0% (63·1–79·0) in non-complete responders according to IRC-assessed IHP 2007 criteria (hazard ratio [HR] 0·4, 95% CI 0·3–0·6, p<0·0001). According to Lugano 2014 criteria, 2·5-year progression-free survival in complete metabolic responders was 87·4% (95% CI 83·7–90·2) and in non-complete metabolic responders was 54·9% (40·5–67·3; HR 0·2, 95% CI 0·1–0·3, p<0·0001). Interpretation: Our results suggest that PET is a better imaging modality than contrast-enhanced CT for response assessment after first-line immunochemotherapy in patients with follicular lymphoma. PET assessment according to Lugano 2014 response criteria provides a platform for investigation of response-adapted therapeutic approaches. Additional supportive data are welcomed. Funding: F Hoffmann-La Roche.
AB - Background: Initial results from the ongoing GALLIUM trial have shown that patients with follicular lymphoma have a longer progression-free survival after first-line immunochemotherapy with obinutuzumab than with rituximab. The aim of this secondary analysis was to evaluate the prognostic value of PET–CT responses after first-line immunochemotherapy in the GALLIUM study. Methods: GALLIUM is an open-label, parallel-group randomised, phase 3 trial, which recruited previously untreated patients with CD20-positive follicular lymphoma (grades 1–3a; disease stage III/IV, or stage II with largest tumour diameter ≥7 cm) who were aged 18 years or older and met the criteria for needing treatment. Eligible patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive intravenous administration of obinutuzumab (1000 mg on days 1, 8, and 15 of cycle 1, then day 1 of subsequent cycles) or rituximab (375 mg/m2 on day 1 of each cycle), in six 21-day cycles with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (known as CHOP; oral administration) followed by two 21-day cycles of antibody alone, or eight 21-day cycles cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and prednisone (known as CVP; oral administration), or six 28-day cycles with bendamustine, followed by maintenance antibody every 2 months for up to 2 years. The primary endpoint of the trial, investigator-assessed progression-free survival, has been reported previously. This secondary analysis reports PET and CT-based responses at end-of-induction therapy and explains their relation with progression-free and overall survival outcomes in patients with available scans. As per protocol, during the trial, PET scans (mandatory in the first 170 patients enrolled at sites with available PET facilities, and optional thereafter), acquired at baseline and end of induction (PET population), were assessed prospectively by investigators and an independent review committee (IRC) applying International Harmonisation Project (IHP) 2007 response criteria, and retrospectively by the IRC only applying current Lugano 2014 response criteria. IRC members (but not study investigators) were masked to treatment and clinical outcome when assessing response. The landmark analyses excluded patients who died or progressed (contrast enhanced CT-based assessment of progressive disease, or started next anti-lymphoma treatment) before or at end of induction. GALLIUM is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01332968. Findings: 1202 patients were enrolled in GALLIUM between July 6, 2011, and Feb 4, 2014, of whom 595 were included in the PET population; 533 (IHP 2007; prospective analysis), and 508 (Lugano 2014; retrospective analysis) were analysed for progression-free survival (landmark analysis). At end of induction, 390 of 595 patients (65·5% [95% CI 61·6–69·4]) achieved PET complete response according to IHP 2007 criteria, and 450 (75·6% [95% CI 72·0–79·0]) obtained PET complete metabolic response according to Lugano 2014 criteria. With a median of 43·3 months of observation (IQR 36·2–51·8), 2·5-year progression-free survival from end of induction was 87·8% (95% CI 83·9–90·8) in PET complete responders and 72·0% (63·1–79·0) in non-complete responders according to IRC-assessed IHP 2007 criteria (hazard ratio [HR] 0·4, 95% CI 0·3–0·6, p<0·0001). According to Lugano 2014 criteria, 2·5-year progression-free survival in complete metabolic responders was 87·4% (95% CI 83·7–90·2) and in non-complete metabolic responders was 54·9% (40·5–67·3; HR 0·2, 95% CI 0·1–0·3, p<0·0001). Interpretation: Our results suggest that PET is a better imaging modality than contrast-enhanced CT for response assessment after first-line immunochemotherapy in patients with follicular lymphoma. PET assessment according to Lugano 2014 response criteria provides a platform for investigation of response-adapted therapeutic approaches. Additional supportive data are welcomed. Funding: F Hoffmann-La Roche.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85057171802&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85057171802&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30618-1
DO - 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30618-1
M3 - Article
C2 - 30309758
AN - SCOPUS:85057171802
SN - 1470-2045
VL - 19
SP - 1530
EP - 1542
JO - The Lancet Oncology
JF - The Lancet Oncology
IS - 11
ER -