TY - JOUR
T1 - Regrowth of zebrafish caudal fin regeneration is determined by the amputated length
AU - Uemoto, Toshiaki
AU - Abe, Gembu
AU - Tamura, Koji
N1 - Funding Information:
We thank the members of Tamura’s laboratory for critical comments on this study and manuscript. This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number JP18H02446, JP18H04811, JP18H04756 to K.T.; the Naito Foundation to K.T.; JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number JP16K18546, JP18K06239 to G.A.; and JSPS Research Fellowships for Young Scientists Grant Number JP18J11712 to T.U.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020, The Author(s).
PY - 2020/12/1
Y1 - 2020/12/1
N2 - Fish have a high ability to regenerate fins, including the caudal fin. After caudal fin amputation, original bi-lobed morphology is reconstructed during its rapid regrowth. It is still controversial whether positional memory in the blastema cells regulates reconstruction of fin morphology as in amphibian limb regeneration, in which limb blastema cells located at the same proximal-distal level have the same positional identity. We investigated growth period and growth rate in zebrafish caudal fin regeneration. We found that both the growth period and growth rate differed for fin rays that were amputated at the same proximal-distal level, indicating that it takes different periods of time for fin rays to restore their original lengths after straight amputation. We also show that more proximal amputation takes longer period to reconstruct the original morphology/size than more distal amputation. Statistical analysis suggested that both the growth period/rate are determined by amputated length (depth) regardless of the fin ray identity along dorsal-ventral axis. In addition, we suggest the possibility that the structural/physical condition such as width of the fin ray at the amputation site (niche at the stump) may determine the growth period/rate.
AB - Fish have a high ability to regenerate fins, including the caudal fin. After caudal fin amputation, original bi-lobed morphology is reconstructed during its rapid regrowth. It is still controversial whether positional memory in the blastema cells regulates reconstruction of fin morphology as in amphibian limb regeneration, in which limb blastema cells located at the same proximal-distal level have the same positional identity. We investigated growth period and growth rate in zebrafish caudal fin regeneration. We found that both the growth period and growth rate differed for fin rays that were amputated at the same proximal-distal level, indicating that it takes different periods of time for fin rays to restore their original lengths after straight amputation. We also show that more proximal amputation takes longer period to reconstruct the original morphology/size than more distal amputation. Statistical analysis suggested that both the growth period/rate are determined by amputated length (depth) regardless of the fin ray identity along dorsal-ventral axis. In addition, we suggest the possibility that the structural/physical condition such as width of the fin ray at the amputation site (niche at the stump) may determine the growth period/rate.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85078298092&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85078298092&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1038/s41598-020-57533-6
DO - 10.1038/s41598-020-57533-6
M3 - Article
C2 - 31959817
AN - SCOPUS:85078298092
SN - 2045-2322
VL - 10
JO - Scientific Reports
JF - Scientific Reports
IS - 1
M1 - 649
ER -