TY - JOUR
T1 - Reliability of respiratory-triggered two-dimensional cine k-adaptive-t-autocalibrating reconstruction for Cartesian sampling for the assessment of biventricular volume and function in patients with repaired tetralogy of Fallot
AU - Orii, Makoto
AU - Sugawara, Tsuyoshi
AU - Takagi, Hidenobu
AU - Nakano, Satoshi
AU - Ueda, Hironobu
AU - Takizawa, Yurie
AU - Fujiwara, Jumpei
AU - Takahashi, Shin
AU - Oyama, Kotaro
AU - Lai, Peng
AU - Janich, Martin A.
AU - Nozaki, Atsushi
AU - Yoshioka, Kunihiro
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Authors. Published by the British Institute of Radiology under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 Unported License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/, which permits unrestricted non-commercial reuse, provided the original author and source are credited.
PY - 2021/4/1
Y1 - 2021/4/1
N2 - Objective: To compare left ventricular (LV) and right ventricular (RV) volume, function, and image quality of a respiratory-triggered two-dimensional (2D)-cine k-adaptive-t-autocalibrating reconstruction for Cartesian sampling (2D kat-ARC) with those of the standard reference, namely, breath-hold 2D balanced steady-state free precession (2D SSFP), in patients with repaired tetralogy of Fallot (TOF). Methods: 30 patients (14 males, mean age 32.2 ± 13.9 years) underwent cardiac magnetic resonance, and 2D kat-ARC and 2D SSFP images were acquired on short-axis view. Biventricular end-diastolic volume (EDV) and end-systolic volume (ESV), stroke volume (SV), ejection fraction (EF), and LV mass (LVM) were analysed. Results: The 2D kat-ARC had significantly shorter scan time (35.2 ± 9.1 s vs 80.4 ± 16.7 s; p < 0.0001). Despite an analysis of image quality showed significant impairment using 2D kat-ARC compared to 2D SSFP cine (p < 0.0001), the two sequences demonstrated no significant difference in terms of biventricular EDV, LVESV, LVSV, LVEF, and LVM. However, the RVESV was overestimated for 2D kat-ARC compared with that for 2D SSFP (73.8 ± 43.2 ml vs 70.3 ± 44.5 ml, p = 0.0002) and the RVSV and RVEF were underestimated (RVSV = 46.2±20.5 ml vs 49.4 ± 20.4 ml, p = 0.0024; RVEF = 40.2±12.7% vs. 43.5±14.0%, p = 0.0002). Conclusion: Respiratory-triggered 2D kat-ARC cine is a reliable technique that could be used in the evaluation of LV volumes and function. Advances in knowledge: 2D cine kat-ARC is a reliable technique for the assessment LV volume and function in patients with repaired TOF.
AB - Objective: To compare left ventricular (LV) and right ventricular (RV) volume, function, and image quality of a respiratory-triggered two-dimensional (2D)-cine k-adaptive-t-autocalibrating reconstruction for Cartesian sampling (2D kat-ARC) with those of the standard reference, namely, breath-hold 2D balanced steady-state free precession (2D SSFP), in patients with repaired tetralogy of Fallot (TOF). Methods: 30 patients (14 males, mean age 32.2 ± 13.9 years) underwent cardiac magnetic resonance, and 2D kat-ARC and 2D SSFP images were acquired on short-axis view. Biventricular end-diastolic volume (EDV) and end-systolic volume (ESV), stroke volume (SV), ejection fraction (EF), and LV mass (LVM) were analysed. Results: The 2D kat-ARC had significantly shorter scan time (35.2 ± 9.1 s vs 80.4 ± 16.7 s; p < 0.0001). Despite an analysis of image quality showed significant impairment using 2D kat-ARC compared to 2D SSFP cine (p < 0.0001), the two sequences demonstrated no significant difference in terms of biventricular EDV, LVESV, LVSV, LVEF, and LVM. However, the RVESV was overestimated for 2D kat-ARC compared with that for 2D SSFP (73.8 ± 43.2 ml vs 70.3 ± 44.5 ml, p = 0.0002) and the RVSV and RVEF were underestimated (RVSV = 46.2±20.5 ml vs 49.4 ± 20.4 ml, p = 0.0024; RVEF = 40.2±12.7% vs. 43.5±14.0%, p = 0.0002). Conclusion: Respiratory-triggered 2D kat-ARC cine is a reliable technique that could be used in the evaluation of LV volumes and function. Advances in knowledge: 2D cine kat-ARC is a reliable technique for the assessment LV volume and function in patients with repaired TOF.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85103305782&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85103305782&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1259/bjr.20201249
DO - 10.1259/bjr.20201249
M3 - Article
C2 - 33733811
AN - SCOPUS:85103305782
SN - 0007-1285
VL - 94
JO - British Journal of Radiology
JF - British Journal of Radiology
IS - 1120
M1 - 20201249
ER -