TY - JOUR
T1 - Research criteria for the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease
T2 - revising the NINCDS-ADRDA criteria
AU - Dubois, Bruno
AU - Feldman, Howard H.
AU - Jacova, Claudia
AU - DeKosky, Steven T.
AU - Barberger-Gateau, Pascale
AU - Cummings, Jeffrey
AU - Delacourte, André
AU - Galasko, Douglas
AU - Gauthier, Serge
AU - Jicha, Gregory
AU - Meguro, Kenichi
AU - O'Brien, John
AU - Pasquier, Florence
AU - Robert, Philippe
AU - Rossor, Martin
AU - Salloway, Steven
AU - Stern, Yaakov
AU - Visser, Pieter J.
AU - Scheltens, Philip
PY - 2007/8
Y1 - 2007/8
N2 - The NINCDS-ADRDA and the DSM-IV-TR criteria for Alzheimer's disease (AD) are the prevailing diagnostic standards in research; however, they have now fallen behind the unprecedented growth of scientific knowledge. Distinctive and reliable biomarkers of AD are now available through structural MRI, molecular neuroimaging with PET, and cerebrospinal fluid analyses. This progress provides the impetus for our proposal of revised diagnostic criteria for AD. Our framework was developed to capture both the earliest stages, before full-blown dementia, as well as the full spectrum of the illness. These new criteria are centred on a clinical core of early and significant episodic memory impairment. They stipulate that there must also be at least one or more abnormal biomarkers among structural neuroimaging with MRI, molecular neuroimaging with PET, and cerebrospinal fluid analysis of amyloid β or tau proteins. The timeliness of these criteria is highlighted by the many drugs in development that are directed at changing pathogenesis, particularly at the production and clearance of amyloid β as well as at the hyperphosphorylation state of tau. Validation studies in existing and prospective cohorts are needed to advance these criteria and optimise their sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy.
AB - The NINCDS-ADRDA and the DSM-IV-TR criteria for Alzheimer's disease (AD) are the prevailing diagnostic standards in research; however, they have now fallen behind the unprecedented growth of scientific knowledge. Distinctive and reliable biomarkers of AD are now available through structural MRI, molecular neuroimaging with PET, and cerebrospinal fluid analyses. This progress provides the impetus for our proposal of revised diagnostic criteria for AD. Our framework was developed to capture both the earliest stages, before full-blown dementia, as well as the full spectrum of the illness. These new criteria are centred on a clinical core of early and significant episodic memory impairment. They stipulate that there must also be at least one or more abnormal biomarkers among structural neuroimaging with MRI, molecular neuroimaging with PET, and cerebrospinal fluid analysis of amyloid β or tau proteins. The timeliness of these criteria is highlighted by the many drugs in development that are directed at changing pathogenesis, particularly at the production and clearance of amyloid β as well as at the hyperphosphorylation state of tau. Validation studies in existing and prospective cohorts are needed to advance these criteria and optimise their sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34447322271&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34447322271&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S1474-4422(07)70178-3
DO - 10.1016/S1474-4422(07)70178-3
M3 - Review article
C2 - 17616482
AN - SCOPUS:34447322271
SN - 1474-4422
VL - 6
SP - 734
EP - 746
JO - The Lancet Neurology
JF - The Lancet Neurology
IS - 8
ER -