Restenosis after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty: Pathologic observations in 20 patients

Masakiyo Nobuyoshi, Takeshi Kimura, Hiroto Ohishi, Hisanori Horiuchi, Hideyuki Nosaka, Naoya Hamasaki, Hiroatsu Yokoi, Koutaku Kim

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

361 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Histopathologic examination was performed in 20 patients undergoing antemortem coronary angioplasty. Thirty-four lesions were dilated and the interval between coronary angioplasty and death ranged from several hours to 4 years. Intimai proliferation of smooth muscle cells, as a major cause of restenosis, was observed in 83% to 100% of 28 lesions examined 11 days to 2 years after coronary angioplasty. In 20 lesions examined within 6 months, proliferating smooth muscle cells were predominantly of the synthetic type and there was abundant extracellular matrix substance chiefly composed of proteoglycans. In eight lesions examined between 6 months and 2 years, contractile type smooth muscle cells were dominant and extracellular matrix was composed chiefly of collagen. In three lesions examined after 2 years, evidence of antemortem coronary angioplasty was hardly identifiable and these lesions were almost indistinguishable from conventional atherosclerotic plaque. These temporal changes in histologic pattern provide a pathologic background for clinical reports that restenosis is predominantly found within 6 months after coronary angioplasty. Morphometry analysis revealed that the extent of intimai proliferation was significantly greater in lesions with evidence of medial or adventitial tears than in lesions with no or only intimai tears.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)433-439
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of the American College of Cardiology
Volume17
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1991

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Restenosis after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty: Pathologic observations in 20 patients'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this