TY - JOUR
T1 - Role of operating and environmental conditions in determining molten pool dynamics during electron beam melting and selective laser melting
AU - Zhao, Yufan
AU - Aoyagi, Kenta
AU - Yamanaka, Kenta
AU - Chiba, Akihiko
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (METI), the New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization (NEDO), the Technology Research Association for Future Additive Manufacturing (TRAFAM), and JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number JP18054020 and JP18041448 . We would like to thank Editage ( www.editage.com ) for English language editing.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2020/12
Y1 - 2020/12
N2 - Electron beam melting (EBM) and selective laser melting (SLM) are representative powder bed fusion additive manufacturing methods. Because EBM and SLM have different operating and environmental conditions, such as ambient pressure of the chamber, initial temperature, and heat source, they have different molten pool dynamics. In this study, single-bead melting experiments using EBM and SLM were performed in conjunction with computational thermal-fluid dynamics simulations in high-energy conditions to highlight the differences in the molten pool dynamics of EBM and SLM. The experimental results reveal that SLM is more likely to melt in the keyhole mode than EBM under nominally identical line energy. The simulations showed that the instantaneous maximum temperature of the SLM molten pool is much lower than that of the EBM molten pool. An increase in the preheating temperature is found to strengthen the vapor recoil pressure; however, the vapor recoil pressure under vacuum is maintained at a considerably low level in EBM. Compared to EBM, the high atmospheric pressure and multiple laser reflections during SLM significantly enhance the effect of the vapor recoil pressure on the melt surface. The findings of this study can be useful for the formulation of appropriate processing strategies for the two processes.
AB - Electron beam melting (EBM) and selective laser melting (SLM) are representative powder bed fusion additive manufacturing methods. Because EBM and SLM have different operating and environmental conditions, such as ambient pressure of the chamber, initial temperature, and heat source, they have different molten pool dynamics. In this study, single-bead melting experiments using EBM and SLM were performed in conjunction with computational thermal-fluid dynamics simulations in high-energy conditions to highlight the differences in the molten pool dynamics of EBM and SLM. The experimental results reveal that SLM is more likely to melt in the keyhole mode than EBM under nominally identical line energy. The simulations showed that the instantaneous maximum temperature of the SLM molten pool is much lower than that of the EBM molten pool. An increase in the preheating temperature is found to strengthen the vapor recoil pressure; however, the vapor recoil pressure under vacuum is maintained at a considerably low level in EBM. Compared to EBM, the high atmospheric pressure and multiple laser reflections during SLM significantly enhance the effect of the vapor recoil pressure on the melt surface. The findings of this study can be useful for the formulation of appropriate processing strategies for the two processes.
KW - Keyhole
KW - Multiple laser reflections
KW - Numerical simulation
KW - Powder bed fusion
KW - Vapor recoil pressure
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85091107487&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85091107487&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.addma.2020.101559
DO - 10.1016/j.addma.2020.101559
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85091107487
SN - 2214-8604
VL - 36
JO - Additive Manufacturing
JF - Additive Manufacturing
M1 - 101559
ER -