TY - JOUR
T1 - Room-temperature fracture toughness of MoSiBTiC alloys
AU - Moriyama, Takahiro
AU - Yoshimi, Kyosuke
AU - Zhao, Mi
AU - Masnou, Tiffany
AU - Yokoyama, Tomohiro
AU - Nakamura, Junya
AU - Katsui, Hirokazu
AU - Goto, Takashi
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by the Advanced Low Carbon Technology Research and Development Program (ALCA) of the Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST).
PY - 2017/5/1
Y1 - 2017/5/1
N2 - Room-temperature fracture toughnesses of TiC-added Mo-Si-B alloys were evaluated for samples of three different compositions prepared using a conventional Ar arc-melting technique. The first alloy (TiCp) had a primary phase during solidification of NaCl-type TiC including an amount of Mo, with a Mo solid solution (Moss) volume fraction of approximately 49% and a TiC volume fraction of approximately 19%, while the volume fraction of Mo5SiB2 (T2) was approximately 31% and the remaining 1% was Mo2C including an amount of Ti. The second alloy (T2p) had a primary phase of T2, with volume fractions of Moss, TiC, Mo5SiB2 (T2), and Mo2C of approximately 38%, 4%, 45%, and 13%, respectively. The third alloy (Mop) had a primary phase of Moss, with volume fractions of Moss, TiC, Mo5SiB2 (T2), and Mo2C of approximately 55%, 8%, 32%, and 6%, respectively. Room-temperature fracture toughness was evaluated by three different bending tests using Chevron-notched specimens. Fracture toughness values obtained by the three methods were relatively close with good reproducibility. Consequently, the fracture toughness values of TiCp, T2p, and Mop were evaluated to be ∼15.2 MPa(m)1/2, ∼10.5 MPa(m)1/2, and ∼13.6 MPa(m)1/2, respectively. Fracture surface observations indicated that the Moss phase is subject to severe plastic deformation during the fracture process. The TiC phase was also noted to leave river patterns behind through crack propagation. These fractographic results suggest that not only the ductile-phase toughening by the Moss phase but also an extra-toughening mechanism by the TiC phase are responsible for the goodness of the room-temperature fracture toughness of the MoSiBTiC alloys.
AB - Room-temperature fracture toughnesses of TiC-added Mo-Si-B alloys were evaluated for samples of three different compositions prepared using a conventional Ar arc-melting technique. The first alloy (TiCp) had a primary phase during solidification of NaCl-type TiC including an amount of Mo, with a Mo solid solution (Moss) volume fraction of approximately 49% and a TiC volume fraction of approximately 19%, while the volume fraction of Mo5SiB2 (T2) was approximately 31% and the remaining 1% was Mo2C including an amount of Ti. The second alloy (T2p) had a primary phase of T2, with volume fractions of Moss, TiC, Mo5SiB2 (T2), and Mo2C of approximately 38%, 4%, 45%, and 13%, respectively. The third alloy (Mop) had a primary phase of Moss, with volume fractions of Moss, TiC, Mo5SiB2 (T2), and Mo2C of approximately 55%, 8%, 32%, and 6%, respectively. Room-temperature fracture toughness was evaluated by three different bending tests using Chevron-notched specimens. Fracture toughness values obtained by the three methods were relatively close with good reproducibility. Consequently, the fracture toughness values of TiCp, T2p, and Mop were evaluated to be ∼15.2 MPa(m)1/2, ∼10.5 MPa(m)1/2, and ∼13.6 MPa(m)1/2, respectively. Fracture surface observations indicated that the Moss phase is subject to severe plastic deformation during the fracture process. The TiC phase was also noted to leave river patterns behind through crack propagation. These fractographic results suggest that not only the ductile-phase toughening by the Moss phase but also an extra-toughening mechanism by the TiC phase are responsible for the goodness of the room-temperature fracture toughness of the MoSiBTiC alloys.
KW - Elastic properties
KW - Fracture toughness
KW - Intermetallics
KW - Microstructure
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85009080289&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85009080289&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.intermet.2017.01.004
DO - 10.1016/j.intermet.2017.01.004
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85009080289
SN - 0966-9795
VL - 84
SP - 92
EP - 102
JO - Intermetallics
JF - Intermetallics
ER -