Rupture of an adjacent cerebral aneurysm following the deployment of a Pipeline embolization device: illustrative case

BACKGROUND Although the Pipeline embolization device (PED) is effective for intracranial aneurysm treatment, its impact on the surrounding vascular structure is unknown. OBSERVATIONS A 71-year-old woman was incidentally found to have a simultaneous large posterior communicating artery aneurysm and an ipsilateral small anterior choroidal artery aneurysm. She underwent flow diversion therapy for both aneurysms with a PED, but the distal shortening of the PED after deployment led to the exposure of the anterior choroidal artery aneurysm. Follow-up angiography revealed complete obliteration of the posterior communicating artery aneurysm, but the anterior choroidal artery aneurysm remained. Three years after the endovascular surgery, the patient experienced a subarachnoid hemorrhage due to the rupture of the anterior choroidal artery aneurysm. Retrospective analysis of angiographic images revealed a change in the vascular geometry surrounding the ruptured aneurysm after PED deployment; this was further accompanied by an increase in the flow velocity inside the aneurysm. LESSONS Because PED use might induce the adverse effects on the adjacent uncovered aneurysm by changing the vascular geometry and hemodynamic stress, a cautious therapeutic strategy, such as proper placement of the stent and using a longer and appropriate-sized PED, should be chosen when deploying the PED.