TY - JOUR
T1 - S34(p,n)34Cl reaction at 35 MeV and its microscopic distorted-wave Born approximation analysis
T2 - Stringent test of the shell model
AU - Furukawa, K.
AU - Kabasawa, M.
AU - Kawamura, T.
AU - Takahashi, Y.
AU - Satoh, A.
AU - Nakagawa, T.
AU - Orihara, H.
AU - Niizeki, T.
AU - Ishii, K.
AU - Maeda, K.
AU - Miura, K.
AU - Brown, B. A.
AU - Ohnuma, H.
PY - 1987
Y1 - 1987
N2 - Differential cross sections for the S34(p,n)34Cl reaction were measured at Ep=35 MeV. Remarkable differences were observed among the angular distribution shapes for the known 1+ states in Cl34 at 0.441, 0.666, 2.581, and 3.128 MeV. Distorted-wave Born approximation calculations using the recent full sd-shell wave functions of Brown and Wildenthal successfully reproduce such differences, whose origin was traced back to the different contributions of the J(LS)=1(0,1) and 1(2,1) transition amplitudes. The 1+ transitions with dominant 1(0,1) amplitudes required a renormalization factor N of about 0.8, which agrees well with that obtained for the + decay of Ar34. The 1+ and 2+ transitions with dominant 1(2,1) and 2(2,1) amplitudes required N of about 0.5. Similar distorted-wave Born approximation calculations gave a good description of the S=0 and L=0 and 2 transitions without any renormalization.
AB - Differential cross sections for the S34(p,n)34Cl reaction were measured at Ep=35 MeV. Remarkable differences were observed among the angular distribution shapes for the known 1+ states in Cl34 at 0.441, 0.666, 2.581, and 3.128 MeV. Distorted-wave Born approximation calculations using the recent full sd-shell wave functions of Brown and Wildenthal successfully reproduce such differences, whose origin was traced back to the different contributions of the J(LS)=1(0,1) and 1(2,1) transition amplitudes. The 1+ transitions with dominant 1(0,1) amplitudes required a renormalization factor N of about 0.8, which agrees well with that obtained for the + decay of Ar34. The 1+ and 2+ transitions with dominant 1(2,1) and 2(2,1) amplitudes required N of about 0.5. Similar distorted-wave Born approximation calculations gave a good description of the S=0 and L=0 and 2 transitions without any renormalization.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0001198496&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0001198496&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1103/PhysRevC.36.1686
DO - 10.1103/PhysRevC.36.1686
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0001198496
SN - 0556-2813
VL - 36
SP - 1686
EP - 1691
JO - Physical Review C - Nuclear Physics
JF - Physical Review C - Nuclear Physics
IS - 5
ER -