Self-incompatibility in brassicaceae crops: Lessons for interspecific incompatibility

Hiroyasu Kitashiba, June B. Nasrallah

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

66 Citations (Scopus)


Most wild plants and some crops of the Brassicaceae express self-incompatibility, which is a mechanism that allows stigmas to recognize and discriminate against "self" pollen, thus preventing self-fertilization and inbreeding. Self-incompatibility in this family is controlled by a single S locus containing two multiallelic genes that encode the stigma-expressed S-locus receptor kinase and its pollen coat-localized ligand, the S-locus cysteine-rich protein. Physical interaction between receptor and ligand encoded in the same S locus activates the receptor and triggers a signaling cascade that results in inhibition of "self" pollen. Sequence information for many S-locus haplotypes in Brassica species has spurred studies of dominance relationships between S haplotypes and of S-locus structure, as well as the development of methods for S genotyping. Furthermore, molecular genetic studies have begun to identify genes that encode putative components of the self-incompatibility signaling pathway. In parallel, standard genetic analysis and QTL analysis of the poorly understood interspecific incompatibility phenomenon have been initiated to identify genes responsible for the inhibition of pollen from other species by the stigma. Herewith, we review recent studies of self-incompatibility and interspecific incompatibility, and we propose a model in which a universal pollen-inhibition pathway is shared by these two incompatibility systems.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)23-37
Number of pages15
JournalBreeding Science
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 2014


  • Brassicaceae
  • Interspecific incompatibility
  • QTL analysis
  • SCR/SP11
  • Self-incompatibility
  • SLG
  • SRK


Dive into the research topics of 'Self-incompatibility in brassicaceae crops: Lessons for interspecific incompatibility'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this