TY - JOUR
T1 - Sensitivity and specificity of mammography and adjunctive ultrasonography to screen for breast cancer in the Japan Strategic Anti-cancer Randomized Trial (J-START)
T2 - A randomised controlled trial
AU - J-START investigator groups
AU - Ohuchi, Noriaki
AU - Suzuki, Akihiko
AU - Sobue, Tomotaka
AU - Kawai, Masaaki
AU - Yamamoto, Seiichiro
AU - Zheng, Ying Fang
AU - Shiono, Yoko Narikawa
AU - Saito, Hiroshi
AU - Kuriyama, Shinichi
AU - Tohno, Eriko
AU - Endo, Tokiko
AU - Fukao, Akira
AU - Tsuji, Ichiro
AU - Yamaguchi, Takuhiro
AU - Ohashi, Yasuo
AU - Fukuda, Mamoru
AU - Ishida, Takanori
N1 - Funding Information:
This study was support by the third Comprehensive Control Research for Cancer programme of the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (grant number H18-Senryaku-001, H23-Shitei-002, H25-Shitei-005).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Elsevier Ltd.
PY - 2016/1/23
Y1 - 2016/1/23
N2 - Summary Background Mammography is the only proven method for breast cancer screening that reduces mortality, although it is inaccurate in young women or women with dense breasts. We investigated the efficacy of adjunctive ultrasonography. Methods Between July, 2007, and March, 2011, we enrolled asymptomatic women aged 40-49 years at 42 study sites in 23 prefectures into the Japan Strategic Anti-cancer Randomized Trial (J-START). Eligible women had no history of any cancer in the previous 5 years and were expected to live for more than 5 years. Randomisation was done centrally by the Japan Clinical Research Support Unit. Participants were randomly assigned in 1:1 ratio to undergo mammography and ultrasonography (intervention group) or mammography alone (control group) twice in 2 years. The primary outcome was sensitivity, specificity, cancer detection rate, and stage distribution at the first round of screening. Analysis was by intention to treat. This study is registered, number UMIN000000757. Findings Of 72998 women enrolled, 36859 were assigned to the intervention group and 36139 to the control group. Sensitivity was significantly higher in the intervention group than in the control group (91·1%, 95% CI 87·2-95·0 vs 77·0%, 70·3-83·7; p=0·0004), whereas specificity was significantly lower (87·7%, 87·3-88·0 vs 91·4%, 91·1-91·7; p<0·0001). More cancers were detected in the intervention group than in the control group (184 [0·50%] vs 117 [0·32%], p=0·0003) and were more frequently stage 0 and I (144 [71·3%] vs 79 [52·0%], p=0·0194). 18 (0·05%) interval cancers were detected in the intervention group compared with 35 (0·10%) in the control group (p=0·034). Interpretation Adjunctive ultrasonography increases sensitivity and detection rate of early cancers. Funding Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan.
AB - Summary Background Mammography is the only proven method for breast cancer screening that reduces mortality, although it is inaccurate in young women or women with dense breasts. We investigated the efficacy of adjunctive ultrasonography. Methods Between July, 2007, and March, 2011, we enrolled asymptomatic women aged 40-49 years at 42 study sites in 23 prefectures into the Japan Strategic Anti-cancer Randomized Trial (J-START). Eligible women had no history of any cancer in the previous 5 years and were expected to live for more than 5 years. Randomisation was done centrally by the Japan Clinical Research Support Unit. Participants were randomly assigned in 1:1 ratio to undergo mammography and ultrasonography (intervention group) or mammography alone (control group) twice in 2 years. The primary outcome was sensitivity, specificity, cancer detection rate, and stage distribution at the first round of screening. Analysis was by intention to treat. This study is registered, number UMIN000000757. Findings Of 72998 women enrolled, 36859 were assigned to the intervention group and 36139 to the control group. Sensitivity was significantly higher in the intervention group than in the control group (91·1%, 95% CI 87·2-95·0 vs 77·0%, 70·3-83·7; p=0·0004), whereas specificity was significantly lower (87·7%, 87·3-88·0 vs 91·4%, 91·1-91·7; p<0·0001). More cancers were detected in the intervention group than in the control group (184 [0·50%] vs 117 [0·32%], p=0·0003) and were more frequently stage 0 and I (144 [71·3%] vs 79 [52·0%], p=0·0194). 18 (0·05%) interval cancers were detected in the intervention group compared with 35 (0·10%) in the control group (p=0·034). Interpretation Adjunctive ultrasonography increases sensitivity and detection rate of early cancers. Funding Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84959537510&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84959537510&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00774-6
DO - 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00774-6
M3 - Article
C2 - 26547101
AN - SCOPUS:84959537510
SN - 0140-6736
VL - 387
SP - 341
EP - 348
JO - The Lancet
JF - The Lancet
IS - 10016
ER -