TY - JOUR
T1 - Stable, non-dissipative, and conservative flux-reconstruction schemes in split forms
AU - Abe, Yoshiaki
AU - Morinaka, Issei
AU - Haga, Takanori
AU - Nonomura, Taku
AU - Shibata, Hisaichi
AU - Miyaji, Koji
N1 - Funding Information:
The present study was supported in part by a Grant-in-Aid for JSPS Fellows (Grant Number 258793 ) and by JSPS KAKENHI (Grant Number 15K13420 , 15K14248 , and 17K18427 ). The authors would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their helpful and constructive comments, which helped us to improve our manuscript.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 The Authors
PY - 2018/1/15
Y1 - 2018/1/15
N2 - A stable, non-dissipative, and conservative flux-reconstruction (FR) scheme is constructed and demonstrated for the compressible Euler and Navier–Stokes equations. A proposed FR framework adopts a split form (also known as the skew-symmetric form) for convective terms. Sufficient conditions to satisfy both the primary conservation (PC) and kinetic energy preservation (KEP) properties are rigorously derived by polynomial-based analysis for a general FR framework. It is found that the split form needs to be expressed in the PC split form or KEP split form to satisfy each property in discrete sense. The PC split form is retrieved from existing general forms (Kennedy and Gruber [33]); in contrast, we have newly introduced the KEP split form as a comprehensive form constituting a KEP scheme in the FR framework. Furthermore, Gauss–Lobatto (GL) solution points and g2 correction function are required to satisfy the KEP property while any correction functions are available for the PC property. The split-form FR framework to satisfy the KEP property, eventually, is similar to the split-form DGSEM–GL method proposed by Gassner [23], but which, in this study, is derived solely by polynomial-based analysis without explicitly using the diagonal-norm SBP property. Based on a series of numerical tests (e.g., Sod shock tube), both the PC and KEP properties have been verified. We have also demonstrated that using a non-dissipative KEP flux, a sixteenth-order (p15) simulation of the viscous Taylor–Green vortex (Re=1,600) is stable and its results are free of unphysical oscillations on relatively coarse mesh (total number of degrees of freedom (DoFs) is 1283).
AB - A stable, non-dissipative, and conservative flux-reconstruction (FR) scheme is constructed and demonstrated for the compressible Euler and Navier–Stokes equations. A proposed FR framework adopts a split form (also known as the skew-symmetric form) for convective terms. Sufficient conditions to satisfy both the primary conservation (PC) and kinetic energy preservation (KEP) properties are rigorously derived by polynomial-based analysis for a general FR framework. It is found that the split form needs to be expressed in the PC split form or KEP split form to satisfy each property in discrete sense. The PC split form is retrieved from existing general forms (Kennedy and Gruber [33]); in contrast, we have newly introduced the KEP split form as a comprehensive form constituting a KEP scheme in the FR framework. Furthermore, Gauss–Lobatto (GL) solution points and g2 correction function are required to satisfy the KEP property while any correction functions are available for the PC property. The split-form FR framework to satisfy the KEP property, eventually, is similar to the split-form DGSEM–GL method proposed by Gassner [23], but which, in this study, is derived solely by polynomial-based analysis without explicitly using the diagonal-norm SBP property. Based on a series of numerical tests (e.g., Sod shock tube), both the PC and KEP properties have been verified. We have also demonstrated that using a non-dissipative KEP flux, a sixteenth-order (p15) simulation of the viscous Taylor–Green vortex (Re=1,600) is stable and its results are free of unphysical oscillations on relatively coarse mesh (total number of degrees of freedom (DoFs) is 1283).
KW - Flux-reconstruction schemes
KW - High-order unstructured scheme
KW - Kinetic energy preservation
KW - Non-dissipative
KW - Skew symmetric
KW - Split form
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85031792935&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85031792935&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jcp.2017.10.007
DO - 10.1016/j.jcp.2017.10.007
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85031792935
SN - 0021-9991
VL - 353
SP - 193
EP - 227
JO - Journal of Computational Physics
JF - Journal of Computational Physics
ER -