Stellar Yields of Rotating Pair Instability Supernovae and Comparison with Observations

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Abstract

A very-massive star forming a massive CO core of 60–120M is considered to explode as a pair-instability supernova (PISN). We have calculated the PISN nucleosynthesis taking both rotating and non-rotating progenitors for the first time to conduct a systematic comparison between theoretical yields and a large sample of metal-poor star abundances. We have found that the predicted low [Na/Mg] -1.5 and high [Ca/Mg] 0.5–1.3 abundance ratios are the most important to discriminate PISN signatures from normal metal-poor star abundances, and have confirmed that no currently observed metal-poor star matches with the PISN abundance. The confirmation of the non-detection may indicate that something important is missing from current understanding of stellar physics. Finally, we discuss that qualitatively different stellar evolution, which is against the PISN explosion, results from a CO core with a higher C fraction than canonical models.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationNuclei in the Cosmos XV
EditorsAlba Formicola, Matthias Junker, Lucio Gialanella, Gianluca Imbriani
PublisherSpringer Science and Business Media, LLC
Pages445-448
Number of pages4
ISBN (Print)9783030138752
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019
Externally publishedYes
Event15th International Symposium on Nuclei in the Cosmos, NIC 2018 - L'Aquila, Italy
Duration: 2018 Jun 242018 Jun 29

Publication series

NameSpringer Proceedings in Physics
Volume219
ISSN (Print)0930-8989
ISSN (Electronic)1867-4941

Conference

Conference15th International Symposium on Nuclei in the Cosmos, NIC 2018
Country/TerritoryItaly
CityL'Aquila
Period18/6/2418/6/29

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physics and Astronomy(all)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Stellar Yields of Rotating Pair Instability Supernovae and Comparison with Observations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this