TY - JOUR
T1 - Subjective discriminability of invisibility
T2 - A framework for distinguishing perceptual and attentional failures of awareness
AU - Kanai, Ryota
AU - Walsh, Vincent
AU - Tseng, Chia Huei
N1 - Funding Information:
We would like to thank Victor Lamme, Ned Block, Naotsugu Tsuchiya, Neil Muggleton and Daw-An Wu for comments on an earlier version of the manuscript. This work was supported by Human Frontier Science Foundation for R.K. and the U.K. Medical Research Council (G0700929) for V.W.
PY - 2010/12
Y1 - 2010/12
N2 - Conscious visual perception can fail in many circumstances. However, little is known about the causes and processes leading to failures of visual awareness. In this study, we introduce a new signal detection measure termed subjective discriminability of invisibility (SDI) that allows one to distinguish between subjective blindness due to reduction of sensory signals or to lack of attentional access to sensory signals. The SDI is computed based upon subjective confidence in reporting the absence of a target (i.e., miss and correct rejection trials). Using this new measure, we found that target misses were subjectively indistinguishable from physical absence when contrast reduction, backward masking and flash suppression were used, whereas confidence was appropriately modulated when dual task, attentional blink and spatial uncertainty methods were employed. These results show that failure of visual perception can be identified as either a result of perceptual or attentional blindness depending on the circumstances under which visual awareness was impaired.
AB - Conscious visual perception can fail in many circumstances. However, little is known about the causes and processes leading to failures of visual awareness. In this study, we introduce a new signal detection measure termed subjective discriminability of invisibility (SDI) that allows one to distinguish between subjective blindness due to reduction of sensory signals or to lack of attentional access to sensory signals. The SDI is computed based upon subjective confidence in reporting the absence of a target (i.e., miss and correct rejection trials). Using this new measure, we found that target misses were subjectively indistinguishable from physical absence when contrast reduction, backward masking and flash suppression were used, whereas confidence was appropriately modulated when dual task, attentional blink and spatial uncertainty methods were employed. These results show that failure of visual perception can be identified as either a result of perceptual or attentional blindness depending on the circumstances under which visual awareness was impaired.
KW - Attention
KW - Attentional blindness
KW - Perceptual blindness
KW - Signal detection theory
KW - Type II
KW - Vision
KW - Visual awareness
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78149496161&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78149496161&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.concog.2010.06.003
DO - 10.1016/j.concog.2010.06.003
M3 - Article
C2 - 20598906
AN - SCOPUS:78149496161
SN - 1053-8100
VL - 19
SP - 1045
EP - 1057
JO - Consciousness and Cognition
JF - Consciousness and Cognition
IS - 4
ER -