TY - JOUR
T1 - [Survey report on magnetic resonance equipment damage in areas in Miyagi Prefecture affected by the Great East Japan Earthquake].
AU - Maeyatsu, Fumio
AU - Abe, Yoshihiro
AU - Hishinuma, Makoto
AU - Hikiti, Takeo
AU - Tanji, Hajime
AU - Seino, Shinya
AU - Adachi, Kojiro
AU - Musashi, Yasunori
AU - Tuchihashi, Toshio
AU - Machida, Yosihio
AU - Yamaguchi-Sekino, Sachiko
AU - Nakai, Toshiharu
PY - 2014/3
Y1 - 2014/3
N2 - A questionnaire comprising 14 items, inquiring about the state of damage, whether safety could be ensured, and progress of repair and restoration was distributed to 984 facilities in seven prefectures on the Pacific coast as part of a fact-finding survey of damage caused to magnetic resonance (MR) devices by the Great East Japan Earthquake. In all, 458 responses (46.6%) were collected. In Miyagi Prefecture alone, 65 responses from 105 questionnaires were collected (response rate: 61.9%). The overall incidence of damage was 19.2%, with 57 facilities (12.4%) reporting that displacement of the magnets was the most common problem. The damage event rate in Miyagi Prefecture was 51.3%, with displacement of the magnet being highest at 17 cases (26.2%). There was a high rate of 13 cases (26.5%) of chiller and air conditioning failures and a rapid loss of He in ten MR scanners (20.4%). Notably, 87.8% of facilities in Miyagi Prefecture (24.5% of the total) were affected by earthquakes exceeding 6 on the Japanese Seismic Intensity Scale. Flood damage caused by the tsunami was also seen along the Sanriku coast to Sendai City (six MR scanners, 50% of the total), and was typical of the damage seen in Miyagi Prefecture.
AB - A questionnaire comprising 14 items, inquiring about the state of damage, whether safety could be ensured, and progress of repair and restoration was distributed to 984 facilities in seven prefectures on the Pacific coast as part of a fact-finding survey of damage caused to magnetic resonance (MR) devices by the Great East Japan Earthquake. In all, 458 responses (46.6%) were collected. In Miyagi Prefecture alone, 65 responses from 105 questionnaires were collected (response rate: 61.9%). The overall incidence of damage was 19.2%, with 57 facilities (12.4%) reporting that displacement of the magnets was the most common problem. The damage event rate in Miyagi Prefecture was 51.3%, with displacement of the magnet being highest at 17 cases (26.2%). There was a high rate of 13 cases (26.5%) of chiller and air conditioning failures and a rapid loss of He in ten MR scanners (20.4%). Notably, 87.8% of facilities in Miyagi Prefecture (24.5% of the total) were affected by earthquakes exceeding 6 on the Japanese Seismic Intensity Scale. Flood damage caused by the tsunami was also seen along the Sanriku coast to Sendai City (six MR scanners, 50% of the total), and was typical of the damage seen in Miyagi Prefecture.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84901834885&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84901834885&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.6009/jjrt.2014_JSRT_70.3.235
DO - 10.6009/jjrt.2014_JSRT_70.3.235
M3 - Article
C2 - 24647061
AN - SCOPUS:84901834885
SN - 0369-4305
VL - 70
SP - 235
EP - 241
JO - Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai zasshi
JF - Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai zasshi
IS - 3
ER -