TY - JOUR
T1 - SWR1 and INO80 chromatin remodelers contribute to dna double-strand break perinuclear anchorage site choice
AU - Horigome, Chihiro
AU - Oma, Yukako
AU - Konishi, Tatsunori
AU - Schmid, Roger
AU - Marcomini, Isabella
AU - Hauer, Michael H.
AU - Dion, Vincent
AU - Harata, Masahiko
AU - Gasser, Susan M.
N1 - Funding Information:
We thank Y. Orihara for help in ChIP experiments, J.E. Haber and M. Seki for yeast strains, S.L. Jaspersen, C. Wu, and K. Mizuta for plasmids, and the Friedrich Miescher Institute Microscopy Facility for technical help. C.H. thanks the Marie Curie International program and JSPS Research Abroad program for fellowships. S.M.G. thanks the Novartis Research Foundation, the Swiss National Science Foundation Sinergia grant, NCCR Frontiers in Genetics, and the Human Frontier Science Program (RGP0017) for support, and M.H. is supported by the Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research on Innovative Areas.
PY - 2014/8/21
Y1 - 2014/8/21
N2 - Persistent DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are recruited to the nuclear periphery in budding yeast. Both the Nup84 pore subcomplex and Mps3, an innernuclear membrane (INM) SUN domain protein, have been implicated in DSB binding. It was unclear what, if anything, distinguishes the two potential sites of repair. Here, we characterize and distinguish thetwo binding sites. First, DSB-pore interaction occurs independently of cell-cycle phase and requires neither the chromatin remodeler INO80 nor recombinase Rad51 activity. In contrast, Mps3 binding is Sand G2 phase specific and requires both factors. SWR1-dependent incorporation of Htz1 (H2A.Z) is necessary for break relocation to either site in both G1- and S-phase cells. Importantly, functional assays indicate that mutations in the two sites have additive repair defects, arguing that the two perinuclear anchorage sites define distinct survival pathways.
AB - Persistent DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are recruited to the nuclear periphery in budding yeast. Both the Nup84 pore subcomplex and Mps3, an innernuclear membrane (INM) SUN domain protein, have been implicated in DSB binding. It was unclear what, if anything, distinguishes the two potential sites of repair. Here, we characterize and distinguish thetwo binding sites. First, DSB-pore interaction occurs independently of cell-cycle phase and requires neither the chromatin remodeler INO80 nor recombinase Rad51 activity. In contrast, Mps3 binding is Sand G2 phase specific and requires both factors. SWR1-dependent incorporation of Htz1 (H2A.Z) is necessary for break relocation to either site in both G1- and S-phase cells. Importantly, functional assays indicate that mutations in the two sites have additive repair defects, arguing that the two perinuclear anchorage sites define distinct survival pathways.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84906790073&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84906790073&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.molcel.2014.06.027
DO - 10.1016/j.molcel.2014.06.027
M3 - Article
C2 - 25066231
AN - SCOPUS:84906790073
SN - 1097-2765
VL - 55
SP - 626
EP - 639
JO - Molecular Cell
JF - Molecular Cell
IS - 4
ER -