The accuracy of reconstruction techniques for determining hybrid rocket fuel regression rate

Yuji Saito, Landon Kamps, Kodai Komizu, Kentaro Soeda, Daniele Bianchi, Francesco Nasuti, Harunori Nagata

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionpeer-review

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study is an investigation of the accuracy of reconstruction techniques for determining instantaneous fuel regression rate. Results of reconstruction techniques are compared with results obtained through the measurement of the pressure drop across the fuel in an Axial-Injection End-Burning hybrid rocket (EBHR). The results of numerous firing tests show that this method allows for the evaluation of the accuracy of the instantaneous fuel regression rates obtained by reconstruction techniques. The error bias of O/F values calculated by the reconstruction techniques were around ±10%, and were mainly caused by uncertainties in the measured values of oxidizer mass flowrate and the definition of firing duration. The instantaneous length of an EBHR-type fuel can be calculated from the measurement of the pressure drop across the fuel. However, the calculated fuel length history obtained by the pressure drop in a port does not coincide with that obtained by the reconstruction technique because of an underestimation in pressure drop.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publication2018 Joint Propulsion Conference
PublisherAmerican Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Inc, AIAA
ISBN (Print)9781624105708
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018
Event54th AIAA/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference, 2018 - Cincinnati, United States
Duration: 2018 Jul 92018 Jul 11

Publication series

Name2018 Joint Propulsion Conference

Conference

Conference54th AIAA/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference, 2018
Country/TerritoryUnited States
CityCincinnati
Period18/7/918/7/11

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The accuracy of reconstruction techniques for determining hybrid rocket fuel regression rate'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this