TY - JOUR
T1 - The Atmospheric Boundary Layer and the “Gray Zone” of Turbulence
T2 - A Critical Review
AU - Honnert, Rachel
AU - Efstathiou, Georgios A.
AU - Beare, Robert J.
AU - Ito, Junshi
AU - Lock, Adrian
AU - Neggers, Roel
AU - Plant, Robert S.
AU - Shin, Hyeyum Hailey
AU - Tomassini, Lorenzo
AU - Zhou, Bowen
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
©2020. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.
PY - 2020/7/16
Y1 - 2020/7/16
N2 - Recent increases in computing power mean that atmospheric models for numerical weather prediction are now able to operate at grid spacings of the order of a few hundred meters, comparable to the dominant turbulence length scales in the atmospheric boundary layer. As a result, models are starting to partially resolve the coherent overturning structures in the boundary layer. In this resolution regime, the so-called boundary layer “gray zone,” neither the techniques of high-resolution atmospheric modeling (a few tens of meters resolution) nor those of traditional meteorological models (a few kilometers resolution) are appropriate because fundamental assumptions behind the parameterizations are violated. Nonetheless, model simulations in this regime may remain highly useful. In this paper, a newly formed gray zone boundary layer community lays the basis for parameterizing gray zone turbulence, identifies the challenges in high-resolution atmospheric modeling and presents different gray zone boundary layer models. We discuss both the successful applications and the limitations of current parameterization approaches, and consider various issues in extending promising research approaches into use for numerical weather prediction. The ultimate goal of the research is the development of unified boundary layer parameterizations valid across all scales.
AB - Recent increases in computing power mean that atmospheric models for numerical weather prediction are now able to operate at grid spacings of the order of a few hundred meters, comparable to the dominant turbulence length scales in the atmospheric boundary layer. As a result, models are starting to partially resolve the coherent overturning structures in the boundary layer. In this resolution regime, the so-called boundary layer “gray zone,” neither the techniques of high-resolution atmospheric modeling (a few tens of meters resolution) nor those of traditional meteorological models (a few kilometers resolution) are appropriate because fundamental assumptions behind the parameterizations are violated. Nonetheless, model simulations in this regime may remain highly useful. In this paper, a newly formed gray zone boundary layer community lays the basis for parameterizing gray zone turbulence, identifies the challenges in high-resolution atmospheric modeling and presents different gray zone boundary layer models. We discuss both the successful applications and the limitations of current parameterization approaches, and consider various issues in extending promising research approaches into use for numerical weather prediction. The ultimate goal of the research is the development of unified boundary layer parameterizations valid across all scales.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85087664978&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85087664978&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1029/2019JD030317
DO - 10.1029/2019JD030317
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85087664978
SN - 2169-897X
VL - 125
JO - Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
JF - Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
IS - 13
M1 - e2019JD030317
ER -