The diagnostic value of vestibular-evoked myogenic potential in patients with vestibular schwannoma

Munetaka Ushio, Shinichi Iwasaki, Toshihisa Murofushi, Keiko Sugasawa, Yasuhiro Chihara, Chisato Fujimoto, Masako Nakamura, Takuhiro Yamaguchi, Tatsuya Yamasoba

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

37 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: This study examined the diagnostic value of the vestibular-evoked myogenic potential (VEMP) in comparison with the caloric test in patients with vestibular schwannoma (VS). Methods: Data were retrospectively collected from 803 consecutive patients who visited our vertigo clinic and underwent vestibular tests. Amongst them, 78 patients were diagnosed as having untreated unilateral VS. VEMP was performed using click and short-tone burst stimulation. The caloric test was performed using ice water. The sensitivity and specificity of each test were evaluated. Results: Of the 78 patients with VS, 63 had abnormal VEMPs as well as abnormal caloric responses. Of the 725 patients without VS, 382 had normal VEMPs and 416 had normal caloric responses. The sensitivity and specificity of VEMP were 80.8% (95% CI: 72.0-89.5%) and 52.7% (95% CI: 49.1-56.3%), respectively; those of the caloric test were 80.8% (95% CI: 72.0-89.5%) and 57.4% (95% CI: 53.8-61.0%), respectively. Conclusions: The sensitivity and specificity of VEMP and the caloric test showed no significant differences. Significance: In patients with VS, although the specificity of VEMP was not very high, its sensitivity was high and comparable to that of the caloric test.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1149-1153
Number of pages5
JournalClinical Neurophysiology
Volume120
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2009 Jun

Keywords

  • Caloric test
  • Sensitivity
  • Specificity
  • Vestibular schwannoma
  • Vestibular-evoked myogenic potential (VEMP)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The diagnostic value of vestibular-evoked myogenic potential in patients with vestibular schwannoma'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this