TY - JOUR
T1 - The diverse pathology and kinetics of mass, nonmass, and focus enhancement on MR imaging of the breast
AU - Jansen, Sanaz A.
AU - Shimauchi, Akiko
AU - Zak, Lindsay
AU - Fan, Xiaobing
AU - Karczmar, Gregory S.
AU - Newstead, Gillian M.
PY - 2011/6
Y1 - 2011/6
N2 - Purpose: To compare the pathology and kinetic characteristics of breast lesions with focus-, mass-, and nonmass-like enhancement. Materials and Methods: A total of 852 MRI detected breast lesions in 697 patients were selected for an IRB approved review. Patients underwent dynamic contrast enhanced MRI using one pre- and three to six postcontrast T1-weighted images. The "type" of enhancement was classified as mass, nonmass, or focus, and kinetic curves quantified by the initial enhancement percentage (E1), time to peak enhancement (Tpeak), and signal enhancement ratio (SER). These kinetic parameters were compared between malignant and benign lesions within each morphologic type. Results: A total of 552 lesions were classified as mass (396 malignant, 156 benign), 261 as nonmass (212 malignant, 49 benign), and 39 as focus (9 malignant, 30 benign). The most common pathology of malignant/benign lesions by morphology: for mass, invasive ductal carcinoma/fibroadenoma; for nonmass, ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS)/fibrocystic change(FCC); for focus, DCIS/FCC. Benign mass lesions exhibited significantly lower E1, longer Tpeak, and lower SER compared with malignant mass lesions (P < 0.0001). Benign nonmass lesions exhibited only a lower SER compared with malignant nonmass lesions (P < 0.01). Conclusion: By considering the diverse pathology and kinetic characteristics of different lesion morphologies, diagnostic accuracy may be improved.
AB - Purpose: To compare the pathology and kinetic characteristics of breast lesions with focus-, mass-, and nonmass-like enhancement. Materials and Methods: A total of 852 MRI detected breast lesions in 697 patients were selected for an IRB approved review. Patients underwent dynamic contrast enhanced MRI using one pre- and three to six postcontrast T1-weighted images. The "type" of enhancement was classified as mass, nonmass, or focus, and kinetic curves quantified by the initial enhancement percentage (E1), time to peak enhancement (Tpeak), and signal enhancement ratio (SER). These kinetic parameters were compared between malignant and benign lesions within each morphologic type. Results: A total of 552 lesions were classified as mass (396 malignant, 156 benign), 261 as nonmass (212 malignant, 49 benign), and 39 as focus (9 malignant, 30 benign). The most common pathology of malignant/benign lesions by morphology: for mass, invasive ductal carcinoma/fibroadenoma; for nonmass, ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS)/fibrocystic change(FCC); for focus, DCIS/FCC. Benign mass lesions exhibited significantly lower E1, longer Tpeak, and lower SER compared with malignant mass lesions (P < 0.0001). Benign nonmass lesions exhibited only a lower SER compared with malignant nonmass lesions (P < 0.01). Conclusion: By considering the diverse pathology and kinetic characteristics of different lesion morphologies, diagnostic accuracy may be improved.
KW - breast DCE-MRI
KW - contrast media kinetics
KW - diagnostic accuracy
KW - malignant
KW - morphology
KW - nonmass-like enhancement
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79958255152&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79958255152&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/jmri.22567
DO - 10.1002/jmri.22567
M3 - Article
C2 - 21591007
AN - SCOPUS:79958255152
SN - 1053-1807
VL - 33
SP - 1382
EP - 1389
JO - Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
JF - Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
IS - 6
ER -