TY - JOUR
T1 - The effect of verbal feedback on motor learning - A PET study
AU - Kawashima, Ryuta
AU - Tajima, Nobumoto
AU - Yoshida, Hajime
AU - Okita, Katsuo
AU - Sasaki, Takeo
AU - Schormann, Torsten
AU - Ogawa, Akira
AU - Fukuda, Hiroshi
AU - Zilles, Karl
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was carried out at the Nishina Memorial Cyclotron Center, Japan Radioisotope Association. This study was supported in part by a JSPS-RFTF (97L00202) grant, and a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research on Priority Areas (No. 09207102, 11145204) to R.K., and an SFB 194/A6 grant to K.Z.
PY - 2000
Y1 - 2000
N2 - The purpose of this study was to investigate brain mechanisms underlying feedback effects on motor learning. We measured human brain activity using positron emission tomography (PET) during length-of-line drawing tasks in the presence or absence of verbal feedback, i.e., information on the precision of motor performance. The average error in responses was significantly lower and the percentage of correct responses was significantly higher in the case of tasks with feedback than those in the absence of feedback. The contralateral sensorimotor, premotor, supplementary motor, the right prefrontal, bilateral parietal and temporal, and anterior cingulate cortices, and the left basal ganglia were activated during all the line-drawing tasks. The right lateral prefrontal and occipital cortices and the left basal ganglia exhibited marked increase in activity after learning. The right inferior parietal and the anterior cingulate cortices were activated in the presence of feedback which provided information on how the subjects should correct their performances. The results indicate that these brain areas may play an important role in representing knowledge of results during motor learning and that appropriate feedback may facilitate motor learning. (C) 2000 Academic Press.
AB - The purpose of this study was to investigate brain mechanisms underlying feedback effects on motor learning. We measured human brain activity using positron emission tomography (PET) during length-of-line drawing tasks in the presence or absence of verbal feedback, i.e., information on the precision of motor performance. The average error in responses was significantly lower and the percentage of correct responses was significantly higher in the case of tasks with feedback than those in the absence of feedback. The contralateral sensorimotor, premotor, supplementary motor, the right prefrontal, bilateral parietal and temporal, and anterior cingulate cortices, and the left basal ganglia were activated during all the line-drawing tasks. The right lateral prefrontal and occipital cortices and the left basal ganglia exhibited marked increase in activity after learning. The right inferior parietal and the anterior cingulate cortices were activated in the presence of feedback which provided information on how the subjects should correct their performances. The results indicate that these brain areas may play an important role in representing knowledge of results during motor learning and that appropriate feedback may facilitate motor learning. (C) 2000 Academic Press.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033652434&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033652434&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1006/nimg.2000.0643
DO - 10.1006/nimg.2000.0643
M3 - Article
C2 - 11112401
AN - SCOPUS:0033652434
SN - 1053-8119
VL - 12
SP - 698
EP - 706
JO - NeuroImage
JF - NeuroImage
IS - 6
ER -