TY - JOUR
T1 - The impact of antiplatelet therapy on patients with vasospastic angina
T2 - A multicenter registry study of the Japanese Coronary Spasm Association
AU - on behalf of the Japanese Coronary Spasm Association
AU - Mori, Hiroyoshi
AU - Takahashi, Jun
AU - Sato, Koichi
AU - Miyata, Satoshi
AU - Takagi, Yusuke
AU - Tsunoda, Ryusuke
AU - Sumiyoshi, Tetsuya
AU - Matsui, Motoyuki
AU - Tanabe, Yasuhiko
AU - Sueda, Shozo
AU - Momomura, Shinichi
AU - Kaikita, Koichi
AU - Yasuda, Satoshi
AU - Ogawa, Hisao
AU - Shimokawa, Hiroaki
AU - Suzuki, Hiroshi
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by the Japan Heart Foundation, Tokyo, Japan
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020
PY - 2020/8
Y1 - 2020/8
N2 - Background: Antiplatelet therapy (APT) is generally used in patients with coronary artery disease. However, for patients with vasospastic angina (VSA), the impact of APT is not fully understood. Methods: In a multicenter registry study of the Japanese Coronary Spasm Association (n = 1429), patients with or without APT were compared. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiac events (MACEs), defined as cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, unstable angina, heart failure and appropriate ICD (Implantable cardioverter defibrillator) shock. Propensity score matching and a multivariable cox proportional hazard model were used to adjust for selection bias for treatment and potential confounding factors. Results: In the whole population, 669 patients received APT, while 760 patients did not receive APT. Patients with APT had a greater prevalence of comorbidities, such as hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia and smoking, than those without APT. The prevalences of previous myocardial infarction, spontaneous ST changes, significant organic stenosis and medications including calcium channel blocker, nitrate, statin and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker were greater in patients with APT than those without APT. After propensity matching (n = 335 for both groups), during the median follow-up period of 32 months, the incidence rate of MACE was comparable between the patients with and without APT (P = 0.24). MACEs occurred in 5.7% of patients with APT and in 3.6% of those without APT (P = 0.20). All-cause death occurred in 0.6% of patients with APT and 1.8% of those without APT (p = 0.16). Conclusion: In this multicenter registry study, anti-platelet therapy exerted no beneficial effects for VSA patients.
AB - Background: Antiplatelet therapy (APT) is generally used in patients with coronary artery disease. However, for patients with vasospastic angina (VSA), the impact of APT is not fully understood. Methods: In a multicenter registry study of the Japanese Coronary Spasm Association (n = 1429), patients with or without APT were compared. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiac events (MACEs), defined as cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, unstable angina, heart failure and appropriate ICD (Implantable cardioverter defibrillator) shock. Propensity score matching and a multivariable cox proportional hazard model were used to adjust for selection bias for treatment and potential confounding factors. Results: In the whole population, 669 patients received APT, while 760 patients did not receive APT. Patients with APT had a greater prevalence of comorbidities, such as hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia and smoking, than those without APT. The prevalences of previous myocardial infarction, spontaneous ST changes, significant organic stenosis and medications including calcium channel blocker, nitrate, statin and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker were greater in patients with APT than those without APT. After propensity matching (n = 335 for both groups), during the median follow-up period of 32 months, the incidence rate of MACE was comparable between the patients with and without APT (P = 0.24). MACEs occurred in 5.7% of patients with APT and in 3.6% of those without APT (P = 0.20). All-cause death occurred in 0.6% of patients with APT and 1.8% of those without APT (p = 0.16). Conclusion: In this multicenter registry study, anti-platelet therapy exerted no beneficial effects for VSA patients.
KW - Anti-platelet therapy
KW - Coronary spastic angina
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85086085739&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85086085739&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ijcha.2020.100561
DO - 10.1016/j.ijcha.2020.100561
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85086085739
SN - 2352-9067
VL - 29
JO - IJC Heart and Vasculature
JF - IJC Heart and Vasculature
M1 - 100561
ER -