The relation between green tea consumption and cardiovascular disease as evidenced by epidemiological studies

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

128 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Although substantial evidence from in vitro and animal studies indicates that green tea preparations inhibit cardiovascular disease processes, the possible protective role of green tea consumption against this disease in humans remains unclear. We conducted a population-based prospective cohort study (the Ohsaki Study) to examine the association between green tea consumption and mortality from cardiovascular disease (CVD), cancer, and all causes with 40,530 persons in Miyagi prefecture, in northern Japan. Previously published work has shown that green tea consumption was inversely associated with mortality from CVD and all causes. The inverse association of mortality from CVD was more pronounced in women (P = 0.08 for interaction with sex). In women, the multivariate hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) of CVD mortality across increasing green tea consumption categories were 1.00, 0.84 (0.63-1.12), 0.69 (0.52-0.93), 0.69 (0.53-0.90) (P for trend = 0.004). Within CVD mortality, the stronger inverse association was observed for stroke mortality. Because our observational study has found the inverse association, I report here the results of a review of epidemiological evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCT) of the association between green tea or green tea extracts and CVD risk profiles. More than half of the RCT have demonstrated the beneficial effects of green tea on CVD risk profiles. These results from RCT suggest a plausible mechanism for the beneficial effects of green tea and provide substantial support for our observations.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1548S-1553S
JournalJournal of Nutrition
Volume138
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2008 Aug

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The relation between green tea consumption and cardiovascular disease as evidenced by epidemiological studies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this