TY - JOUR
T1 - Thermal design investigation for a flinabe blanket system
AU - Shishido, Hiroki
AU - Yusa, Noritaka
AU - Hashizume, Hidetoshi
AU - Ishii, Yoshiki
AU - Ohtori, Norikazu
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by Grant-in-Aid for JSPS Research Fellows 15J02987.
Publisher Copyright:
© American Nuclear Society.
PY - 2017/10
Y1 - 2017/10
N2 - The present study evaluates the thermal design of a blanket system using Flinabe in order to facilitate further discussions on its applicability as a self-cooled liquid blanket system. Molecular dynamics simulations were performed to evaluate the Prandtl number of mixtures in five compositions (LiF-NaF-BeF2 = 31-31-38, 36-27-37, 42-22-36, 49-16-35, and 67-0-33). Thermofluid analysis was carried out to estimate the temperature margin and pressure drop per unit length in a simple geometry model of the blanket system. The Prandtl number of Flinabe is above 100 at 400°C. The present study reveals that Flinabe remarkably relaxes the design conditions compared to Flibe as a coolant owing to its low melting point. In contrast, the pressure drop per unit length of Flinabe is higher than that of Flibe because the viscosity exponentially increases at low temperature. The temperature margin is quite dependent on the heat load on the first wall. If the pressure drop per unit length is around 1.0 MPa/m, the heat load value must be approximately below 0.7 MW/m2.
AB - The present study evaluates the thermal design of a blanket system using Flinabe in order to facilitate further discussions on its applicability as a self-cooled liquid blanket system. Molecular dynamics simulations were performed to evaluate the Prandtl number of mixtures in five compositions (LiF-NaF-BeF2 = 31-31-38, 36-27-37, 42-22-36, 49-16-35, and 67-0-33). Thermofluid analysis was carried out to estimate the temperature margin and pressure drop per unit length in a simple geometry model of the blanket system. The Prandtl number of Flinabe is above 100 at 400°C. The present study reveals that Flinabe remarkably relaxes the design conditions compared to Flibe as a coolant owing to its low melting point. In contrast, the pressure drop per unit length of Flinabe is higher than that of Flibe because the viscosity exponentially increases at low temperature. The temperature margin is quite dependent on the heat load on the first wall. If the pressure drop per unit length is around 1.0 MPa/m, the heat load value must be approximately below 0.7 MW/m2.
KW - Flinabe
KW - Liquid blanket
KW - Molecular dynamics
KW - Molten salt
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85029943255&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85029943255&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/15361055.2017.1330623
DO - 10.1080/15361055.2017.1330623
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85029943255
SN - 1536-1055
VL - 72
SP - 382
EP - 388
JO - Fusion Science and Technology
JF - Fusion Science and Technology
IS - 3
ER -