TY - JOUR
T1 - Three-dimensionally printed implant surgical guide-related experience, knowledge, attitude, and professional behaviors among 2028 dentists in China
T2 - A cross-sectional study
AU - Muhetaer, Aihemaiti
AU - Yang, Hongye
AU - Liu, Yan
AU - Huang, Cui
N1 - Funding Information:
Funding: Supported by the Technology Innovation Major Special Project of Hubei Province, grant #2019ACA139.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Editorial Council for the Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
PY - 2023/3
Y1 - 2023/3
N2 - Statement of problem: Research on the current place of 3-dimensionally printed implant surgical guides (3D-ISGs) among practicing dentists worldwide is lacking, with little research focused on dentists’ experience, knowledge, attitude, or professional behavior related to 3D-ISG or on the main obstacle to adoption. Purpose: The purpose of this cross-sectional study was to identify the adoption of 3D-ISG in dental practice in China and to determine factors that influence its further application and dentists’ attitudes and willingness. Material and methods: Semistructured questionnaires were sent to a sample of Chinese dentists composed of users and nonusers of 3D-ISG. The questionnaires were displayed and distributed through a professional online survey system (http://www.wjx.cn) and a social media platform (WeChat). The responses were analyzed with multivariable generalized equations, and the effect of various demographic variables was determined, including dentist experience, academic degree, and type of practice (public or private). Results: A total of 2028 valid questionnaires were collected. In dental practice, 39.3% of the respondents used 3D-ISG. Respondents with a PhD (62.4%) used the 3D-ISG more than twice as frequently as respondents with a junior college degree or below (31.8%). The majority of the members of implantology departments (81.7%) applied 3D-ISG, but doctors in other departments used it at a rate of less than half. The 3D-ISG was most frequently used in the maxillary anterior area (78.4%), followed by the edentulous maxilla and mandible (61.0% and 60.5%, respectively). The main barriers were high initial cost, complex and time-consuming digital design, and lack of expertise in the proper use of 3D-ISG. Conclusions: Most dentists did not use 3D-ISG in dental practice. The 3D-ISG application rate was significantly associated with sex, academic degree, years of dental practice, department, monthly income, and type of healthcare facility. To improve the popularity of 3D-ISG, particularly among dentists without advanced degrees, it would be important to optimize the digital design software program and provide sufficient training.
AB - Statement of problem: Research on the current place of 3-dimensionally printed implant surgical guides (3D-ISGs) among practicing dentists worldwide is lacking, with little research focused on dentists’ experience, knowledge, attitude, or professional behavior related to 3D-ISG or on the main obstacle to adoption. Purpose: The purpose of this cross-sectional study was to identify the adoption of 3D-ISG in dental practice in China and to determine factors that influence its further application and dentists’ attitudes and willingness. Material and methods: Semistructured questionnaires were sent to a sample of Chinese dentists composed of users and nonusers of 3D-ISG. The questionnaires were displayed and distributed through a professional online survey system (http://www.wjx.cn) and a social media platform (WeChat). The responses were analyzed with multivariable generalized equations, and the effect of various demographic variables was determined, including dentist experience, academic degree, and type of practice (public or private). Results: A total of 2028 valid questionnaires were collected. In dental practice, 39.3% of the respondents used 3D-ISG. Respondents with a PhD (62.4%) used the 3D-ISG more than twice as frequently as respondents with a junior college degree or below (31.8%). The majority of the members of implantology departments (81.7%) applied 3D-ISG, but doctors in other departments used it at a rate of less than half. The 3D-ISG was most frequently used in the maxillary anterior area (78.4%), followed by the edentulous maxilla and mandible (61.0% and 60.5%, respectively). The main barriers were high initial cost, complex and time-consuming digital design, and lack of expertise in the proper use of 3D-ISG. Conclusions: Most dentists did not use 3D-ISG in dental practice. The 3D-ISG application rate was significantly associated with sex, academic degree, years of dental practice, department, monthly income, and type of healthcare facility. To improve the popularity of 3D-ISG, particularly among dentists without advanced degrees, it would be important to optimize the digital design software program and provide sufficient training.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85147345962&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85147345962&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.01.002
DO - 10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.01.002
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85147345962
SN - 0022-3913
VL - 129
SP - 448.e1-448.e8
JO - Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
JF - Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
IS - 3
ER -