TY - JOUR
T1 - Torsional properties and microstructures of miniscrew implants
AU - Iijima, Masahiro
AU - Muguruma, Takeshi
AU - Brantley, William A.
AU - Okayama, Miki
AU - Yuasa, Toshihiro
AU - Mizoguchi, Itaru
PY - 2008/9
Y1 - 2008/9
N2 - Introduction: Titanium miniscrew implants are popular in orthodontics, but there is little information about their torsional performance. Methods: Four brands of miniscrew implants (A-D) with 1.6-mm diameters were compared, with miniscrew A implants also having diameters of 1.2 to 2.0 mm. Nominal compositions of the implants were determined by x-ray fluorescence (n = 8). The miniscrews were loaded to failure in torsion, and the mean moment and twist angle were determined for each group (n = 8). Data were compared by ANOVA and the Tukey multiple range tests. Micro x-ray diffraction (n = 3) was used to identify phases in the implants, and the phases were also examined in etched cross-sections with a scanning electron microscope. Results: Miniscrew A and C implants were pure titanium, whereas miniscrew B and D implants contained small amounts of vanadium, aluminum, iron, and manganese. Only alpha-titanium peaks were detected for all implants by micro x-ray diffraction, but beta titanium was observed in the microstructures of miniscrew B and D implants, which had significantly higher torsional moments at failure. Conclusions: Addition of small amounts of other elements to titanium yielded significantly improved torsional performance for miniscrew implants. Research to develop optimum compositions for mechanical properties and biocompatibility is needed.
AB - Introduction: Titanium miniscrew implants are popular in orthodontics, but there is little information about their torsional performance. Methods: Four brands of miniscrew implants (A-D) with 1.6-mm diameters were compared, with miniscrew A implants also having diameters of 1.2 to 2.0 mm. Nominal compositions of the implants were determined by x-ray fluorescence (n = 8). The miniscrews were loaded to failure in torsion, and the mean moment and twist angle were determined for each group (n = 8). Data were compared by ANOVA and the Tukey multiple range tests. Micro x-ray diffraction (n = 3) was used to identify phases in the implants, and the phases were also examined in etched cross-sections with a scanning electron microscope. Results: Miniscrew A and C implants were pure titanium, whereas miniscrew B and D implants contained small amounts of vanadium, aluminum, iron, and manganese. Only alpha-titanium peaks were detected for all implants by micro x-ray diffraction, but beta titanium was observed in the microstructures of miniscrew B and D implants, which had significantly higher torsional moments at failure. Conclusions: Addition of small amounts of other elements to titanium yielded significantly improved torsional performance for miniscrew implants. Research to develop optimum compositions for mechanical properties and biocompatibility is needed.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=50549097964&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=50549097964&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.03.012
DO - 10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.03.012
M3 - Article
C2 - 18774076
AN - SCOPUS:50549097964
SN - 0889-5406
VL - 134
SP - 333.e1-333.e6
JO - American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
JF - American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
IS - 3
ER -