TY - JOUR
T1 - Towards a comparative framework of adaptive planning and anticipatory action regimes in Chile, Japan, and the US
T2 - An exploration of multiple contexts informing tsunami risk-based planning and relocation
AU - Kuriyama, Naoko
AU - Maly, Elizabeth
AU - León, Jorge
AU - Abramson, Daniel
AU - Nguyen, Lan T.
AU - Bostrom, Ann
N1 - Funding Information:
This ongoing collaboration and research has been supported by: IRIDeS, Tohoku University; the Core Research Cluster of Disaster Science; Tohoku University; and the University of Washington-Tohoku University: Academic Open Space (UW-TU:AOS); and Center for Resilient Design (CResD), Kobe University and JSPS-R2904.
Funding Information:
Facing shared factors of social and economic vulnerability, these coastal communities heavily rely on government policies and assistance for mitigation and recovery support pre-and post-disaster. As explained in more detail the following sections, policies related to disaster response and recovery are closely related to non-disaster policy contexts of social welfare in each country. In the case of coastal communities in Japan after the GEJE, recovery projects were fully funded by the national government, similar to national policies of social welfare, and supported by government funding for infrastructure and to dispatch experts to help with planning and project implementation. In Chile, the role and level of funding from the national government is not as strong, with a lack of professional expertise as well as financial resources at the local level, which is also similar to the non-disaster context of social welfare in the country. In the United States, where government policies pre-and post-disaster have a limited degree of investment in social welfare, focusing rather on the protection of private property, there
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020, Fuji Technology Press. All rights reserved.
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - Coastal regions around the Pacific Ring of Fire share the risk of massive earthquakes and tsunamis. Along with their own political-economic, cultural and bio-physical contexts, each region has their own history and experiences of tsunami disasters. Coastal areas of Washington State in the U.S. are currently at risk of experiencing a tsunami following a massive Magnitude 9 (M9) earthquake anticipated in the Cascadia Subduction Zone (CSZ). Looking ahead to consider adaptive planning in advance of a tsunami following this M9 event, this paper explores how lessons from recent megaquake-and tsunami-related experiences of risk-based planning and relocation in coastal areas of Japan and Chile could inform anticipatory action in coastal Washington State. Based on a comparison of earthquake and tsunami hazards, social factors, and the roles of government, this paper outlines a framework to compare policy contexts of tsunami risk-based planning and relocation in three Ring of Fire coun-tries, including factors shaping the possible transfer of approaches between them. Findings suggest some aspects of comparative significance and commonalities shared across coastal communities in the three countries and at the same time highlight numerous differ-ences in governance and policies related to planning and relocation. Although there are limitations to the transferability of lessons in disaster adaptive planning and anticipatory action from one national/regional context to another, we believe there is much more that Washington and the Pacific Northwest can learn from Japanese and Chilean experiences. In any context, risk reduction policies and actions need to garner political support in order to be implemented. Additional case study research and detailed analysis is still needed to understand specific lessons that may be applied to detailed risk-based planning and relocation programs across these different national contexts.
AB - Coastal regions around the Pacific Ring of Fire share the risk of massive earthquakes and tsunamis. Along with their own political-economic, cultural and bio-physical contexts, each region has their own history and experiences of tsunami disasters. Coastal areas of Washington State in the U.S. are currently at risk of experiencing a tsunami following a massive Magnitude 9 (M9) earthquake anticipated in the Cascadia Subduction Zone (CSZ). Looking ahead to consider adaptive planning in advance of a tsunami following this M9 event, this paper explores how lessons from recent megaquake-and tsunami-related experiences of risk-based planning and relocation in coastal areas of Japan and Chile could inform anticipatory action in coastal Washington State. Based on a comparison of earthquake and tsunami hazards, social factors, and the roles of government, this paper outlines a framework to compare policy contexts of tsunami risk-based planning and relocation in three Ring of Fire coun-tries, including factors shaping the possible transfer of approaches between them. Findings suggest some aspects of comparative significance and commonalities shared across coastal communities in the three countries and at the same time highlight numerous differ-ences in governance and policies related to planning and relocation. Although there are limitations to the transferability of lessons in disaster adaptive planning and anticipatory action from one national/regional context to another, we believe there is much more that Washington and the Pacific Northwest can learn from Japanese and Chilean experiences. In any context, risk reduction policies and actions need to garner political support in order to be implemented. Additional case study research and detailed analysis is still needed to understand specific lessons that may be applied to detailed risk-based planning and relocation programs across these different national contexts.
KW - Disaster governance
KW - Earthquake
KW - Residential relocation
KW - Risk-based planning
KW - Tsunami
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85097496415&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85097496415&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.20965/jdr.2020.p0878
DO - 10.20965/jdr.2020.p0878
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85097496415
SN - 1881-2473
VL - 15
SP - 878
EP - 889
JO - Journal of Disaster Research
JF - Journal of Disaster Research
IS - 7
ER -