TY - JOUR
T1 - Transdisciplinary co-design of scientific research agendas
T2 - 40 research questions for socially relevant climate engineering research
AU - Sugiyama, Masahiro
AU - Asayama, Shinichiro
AU - Kosugi, Takanobu
AU - Ishii, Atsushi
AU - Emori, Seita
AU - Adachi, Jiro
AU - Akimoto, Keigo
AU - Fujiwara, Masatomo
AU - Hasegawa, Tomoko
AU - Hibi, Yasushi
AU - Hirata, Kimiko
AU - Ishii, Toru
AU - Kaburagi, Takeshi
AU - Kita, Yuki
AU - Kobayashi, Shigeki
AU - Kurosawa, Atsushi
AU - Kuwata, Manabu
AU - Masuda, Kooiti
AU - Mitsui, Makoto
AU - Miyata, Taku
AU - Mizutani, Hiroshi
AU - Nakayama, Sumie
AU - Oyamada, Kazuyo
AU - Sashida, Takaaki
AU - Sekiguchi, Miho
AU - Takahashi, Kiyoshi
AU - Takamura, Yukari
AU - Taki, Junichi
AU - Taniguchi, Taketoshi
AU - Tezuka, Hiroyuki
AU - Ueno, Takahiro
AU - Watanabe, Shingo
AU - Watanabe, Rie
AU - Yamagishi, Naoyuki
AU - Yoshizawa, Go
N1 - Funding Information:
We sincerely express our gratitude to William Sutherland for spending time with us and sharing his insights. We thank Kayoko Namba for her excellent logistical and research assistance. We thank Yosuke Arino and Ryo Moriyama for their advice on the workshop design. We also extend our gratitude to all of the contributors to the initial set of research questions. We thank two anonymous reviewers for their constructive criticisms. This project was supported by the Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST) Research Institute of Science and Technology for Society (RISTEX) as part of the Future Earth project.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2016, Springer Japan.
PY - 2017/1/1
Y1 - 2017/1/1
N2 - Interest in climate engineering research has grown rapidly owing to the slow progress of international climate negotiations. As some scientists are proposing to expand research and conduct field tests, there is an emerging debate about whether and how it should proceed. It is widely accepted both by the supporters and critics that public engagement from the early stage of research is necessary. Nonetheless, most, if not all, of existing research projects of climate engineering were designed predominantly by experts. To produce socially relevant knowledge, and hence, pursue transdisciplinary research that integrates interdisciplinary research and public engagement, it is desirable for scientists to decide together with the public on what kind of research should be done. In this paper, we both as Japanese scientists and stakeholders collaboratively identify 40 socially relevant research questions on climate engineering with a particular emphasis on stratospheric aerosol injection, using a method designed to encourage science–policy collaboration. While we acknowledge some methodological problems and the difficulty in obtaining active participation from stakeholders, the list of identified questions covers broad interdisciplinary perspectives and diverse interests, and may provide an important foundation for future transdisciplinary research on climate engineering. Given the dynamic nature of climate change and policy responses, research agendas should be periodically and iteratively reviewed and updated through transdisciplinary processes.
AB - Interest in climate engineering research has grown rapidly owing to the slow progress of international climate negotiations. As some scientists are proposing to expand research and conduct field tests, there is an emerging debate about whether and how it should proceed. It is widely accepted both by the supporters and critics that public engagement from the early stage of research is necessary. Nonetheless, most, if not all, of existing research projects of climate engineering were designed predominantly by experts. To produce socially relevant knowledge, and hence, pursue transdisciplinary research that integrates interdisciplinary research and public engagement, it is desirable for scientists to decide together with the public on what kind of research should be done. In this paper, we both as Japanese scientists and stakeholders collaboratively identify 40 socially relevant research questions on climate engineering with a particular emphasis on stratospheric aerosol injection, using a method designed to encourage science–policy collaboration. While we acknowledge some methodological problems and the difficulty in obtaining active participation from stakeholders, the list of identified questions covers broad interdisciplinary perspectives and diverse interests, and may provide an important foundation for future transdisciplinary research on climate engineering. Given the dynamic nature of climate change and policy responses, research agendas should be periodically and iteratively reviewed and updated through transdisciplinary processes.
KW - Climate engineering
KW - Co-design of research agenda
KW - Public engagement
KW - Stratospheric aerosol injection
KW - Transdisciplinary research
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85008929614&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85008929614&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s11625-016-0376-2
DO - 10.1007/s11625-016-0376-2
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85008929614
SN - 1862-4065
VL - 12
SP - 31
EP - 44
JO - Sustainability Science
JF - Sustainability Science
IS - 1
ER -