TY - JOUR
T1 - Treatment of classic-type Hirschsprung’s disease
T2 - rectoplasty with posterior triangular colonic flap versus transanal endorectal pull-through with rectoanal myotomy
AU - Nakamura, Megumi
AU - Wada, Motoshi
AU - Fukuzawa, Taichi
AU - Tanaka, Hiromu
AU - Kudo, Hironori
AU - Ando, Ryo
AU - Yamaki, Satoshi
AU - Watanabe, Tomohiko
AU - Tada, Keisuke
AU - Nakajima, Yudai
AU - Nio, Masaki
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018, Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
PY - 2019/2/5
Y1 - 2019/2/5
N2 - Purpose: Our institution employs rectoplasty with a posterior triangular colonic flap (RPTCF) for classic-type Hirschsprung’s disease. Recently, we employed a modified Soave procedure: transanal endorectal pull-through with rectoanal myotomy (TEPTRAM). In both procedures, the internal sphincter muscle is completely divided vertically at the 6 o’clock position. Unlike RPTCF, TEPTRAM does not require abdominal manipulation. We aimed to verify the usefulness of TEPTRAM. Methods: 64 patients with classic-type Hirschsprung’s disease who underwent surgery between 1970 and 2017 were divided into group R (RPTCF, 47 cases) and group T (TEPTRAM, 17 cases). We compared the defecation function of the groups. Results: No patient showed fecal incontinence (R: 0/41, T: 0/10, ns). Three patients (6%) in group R and four (24%) in group T developed postoperative enterocolitis (P = 0.16). Three patients (10%) in group R and one (20%) in group T needed an enema (P = 0.36). Conclusion: There was no adverse effect of rectoanal myotomy; incontinence was not observed in either procedure. Although there was no significant difference, the incidences of enterocolitis and constipation were slightly higher in group T, perhaps because of the residual muscle cuff; therefore, it is necessary to provide best care with attention to constipation immediately after surgery.
AB - Purpose: Our institution employs rectoplasty with a posterior triangular colonic flap (RPTCF) for classic-type Hirschsprung’s disease. Recently, we employed a modified Soave procedure: transanal endorectal pull-through with rectoanal myotomy (TEPTRAM). In both procedures, the internal sphincter muscle is completely divided vertically at the 6 o’clock position. Unlike RPTCF, TEPTRAM does not require abdominal manipulation. We aimed to verify the usefulness of TEPTRAM. Methods: 64 patients with classic-type Hirschsprung’s disease who underwent surgery between 1970 and 2017 were divided into group R (RPTCF, 47 cases) and group T (TEPTRAM, 17 cases). We compared the defecation function of the groups. Results: No patient showed fecal incontinence (R: 0/41, T: 0/10, ns). Three patients (6%) in group R and four (24%) in group T developed postoperative enterocolitis (P = 0.16). Three patients (10%) in group R and one (20%) in group T needed an enema (P = 0.36). Conclusion: There was no adverse effect of rectoanal myotomy; incontinence was not observed in either procedure. Although there was no significant difference, the incidences of enterocolitis and constipation were slightly higher in group T, perhaps because of the residual muscle cuff; therefore, it is necessary to provide best care with attention to constipation immediately after surgery.
KW - Duhamel procedure
KW - Hirschsprung’s disease
KW - Posterior triangular colonic flap
KW - Rectoanal myotomy
KW - Soave procedure
KW - Transanal endorectal pull-through
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85055963505&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85055963505&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00383-018-4396-0
DO - 10.1007/s00383-018-4396-0
M3 - Article
C2 - 30390138
AN - SCOPUS:85055963505
SN - 0179-0358
VL - 35
SP - 203
EP - 207
JO - Pediatric Surgery International
JF - Pediatric Surgery International
IS - 2
ER -