TY - JOUR
T1 - TROPOMI-Sentinel-5 Precursor formaldehyde validation using an extensive network of ground-based Fourier-transform infrared stations
AU - Vigouroux, Corinne
AU - Langerock, Bavo
AU - Augusto Bauer Aquino, Carlos
AU - Blumenstock, Thomas
AU - Cheng, Zhibin
AU - De Mazière, Martine
AU - De Smedt, Isabelle
AU - Grutter, Michel
AU - Hannigan, James W.
AU - Jones, Nicholas
AU - Kivi, Rigel
AU - Loyola, DIego
AU - Lutsch, Erik
AU - Mahieu, Emmanuel
AU - Makarova, Maria
AU - Metzger, Jean Marc
AU - Morino, Isamu
AU - Murata, Isao
AU - Nagahama, Tomoo
AU - Notholt, Justus
AU - Ortega, Ivan
AU - Palm, Mathias
AU - Pinardi, Gaia
AU - Röhling, Amelie
AU - Smale, Dan
AU - Stremme, Wolfgang
AU - Strong, Kim
AU - Sussmann, Ralf
AU - Té, Yao
AU - Van Roozendael, Michel
AU - Wang, Pucai
AU - Winkler, Holger
N1 - Funding Information:
The NCAR FTS observation programmes at Thule, GR; Boulder, CO; and Mauna Loa, HI, are supported under contract by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). The Thule work is also supported by the NSF Office of Polar Programs (OPP). We wish to thank the Danish Meteorological Institute for support at the Thule site and the NOAA for support at the Mauna Loa site. Financial support was also provided by DGAPA-UNAM (grant nos. 07417 and 111418) and CONACYT (grant no. 290589). We thank the University Network of Atmospheric Observatories (RUOA) for the maintenance and operation of the Mexican stations. The Paris TCCON site has received funding from Sorbonne Université, the French research centre CNRS, the French space agency CNES, and Région Île-de-France. Eureka measurements were made at the Polar Environment Atmospheric Research Laboratory (PEARL) under the CANDAC and PAHA projects led by James R. Drummond and in part by the Canadian Arctic ACE/OSIRIS Validation Campaigns led by Kaley A. Walker. Funding was provided by AIF/NSRIT, CFI, CFCAS, CSA, ECCC, GOC-IPY, NSERC, NSTP, OIT, PCSP, and ORF. Logistical and operational support was provided by PEARL site manager Pierre Fogal, the CANDAC operators, and the ECCC weather station. Toronto measurements were made at the University of Toronto Atmospheric Observatory, supported by CFCAS, ABB Bomem, CFI, CSA, ECCC, NSERC, ORDCF, PREA, and the University of Toronto. FTIR operations of the Rikubetsu and Tsukuba sites are financially supported in part by the GOSAT series project.
Funding Information:
Financial support. This study has been supported by the ESA
Funding Information:
PRODEX projects TROVA and TROVA-E2, funded by the Belgian Science Policy Office (Belspo). The measurements at Reunion Island have also been supported by the Université de La Réunion and CNRS (LACy-UMR8105 and UMS3365) as well as at Porto Velho by the BRAIN-be pioneer project IKARE, funded by Belspo, with the collaboration of the Instituto Federal de Educaçao, Ciên-cia e Tecnologia de Rondônia (IFRO). The measurements at Reunion Island have been supported by BIRA-IASB and the Univer-sité de La Réunion and CNRS (LACy-UMR8105 and UMS3365). The measurements at Porto Velho were funded by the BRAIN-be pioneer project IKARE (Belspo), with the collaboration of the Instituto Federal de Educaçao, Ciência e Tecnologia de Rondônia (IFRO). The SPbU FTIR team has been supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research project no. 18-05-00011. St. Petersburg FTIR measurements were carried out by the instrumentation of the GEOMODEL resource centre of SPbU. The NDACC stations Bremen, Izaña, Ny-Ålesund, and Paramaribo have been supported by the German Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und En-ergie (BMWi) via DLR under grants 50EE1711A, B, and D. We thank the EU project STRATOCLIM for financial support to U. of Bremen. Measurements made at Lauder by NIWA are funded by New Zealand’s Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment through the Strategic Science Investment Fund. We thank the AWI Bremerhaven for logistical support and the station personnel in Ny-Ålesund. On-site support in Paramaribo, Suriname, was provided by the Meterologische Dienst van Suriname. Logistical and on-site support in Koror, Palau, was provided by the AWI Potsdam and the Coral Reef Foundation. ULiège has received support from the F.R.S. – FNRS, from the Fédération Wallonie-Bruxelles, and from the GAW-CH programme of MeteoSwiss. The International Foundation High Altitude Research Stations Jungfraujoch and Gorner-grat (HFSJG, Bern) provided support to the facilities needed to perform the Jungfraujoch observations. Emmanuel Mahieu is research associate with the F.R.S. – FNRS. The National Center for Atmospheric Research is sponsored by the National Science Foundation.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 EDP Sciences. All rights reserved.
PY - 2020/7/10
Y1 - 2020/7/10
N2 - TROPOMI (the TROPOspheric Monitoring Instrument), on board the Sentinel-5 Precursor (S5P) satellite, has been monitoring the Earth s atmosphere since October 2017 with an unprecedented horizontal resolution (initially 7 km2-3:5 km2, upgraded to 5.5 km2-3:5 km2 in August 2019). Monitoring air quality is one of the main objectives of TROPOMI; it obtains measurements of important pollutants such as nitrogen dioxide, carbon monoxide, and formaldehyde (HCHO). In this paper we assess the quality of the latest HCHO TROPOMI products versions 1.1.(5-7), using ground-based solar-absorption FTIR (Fourier-transform infrared) measurements of HCHO from 25 stations around the world, including high-, mid-, and low-latitude sites. Most of these stations are part of the Network for the Detection of Atmospheric Composition Change (NDACC), and they provide a wide range of observation conditions, from very clean remote sites to those with high HCHO levels from anthropogenic or biogenic emissions. The ground-based HCHO retrieval settings have been optimized and harmonized at all the stations, ensuring a consistent validation among the sites. In this validation work, we first assess the accuracy of TROPOMI HCHO tropospheric columns using the median of the relative differences between TROPOMI and FTIR ground-based data (BIAS). The pre-launch accuracy requirements of TROPOMI HCHO are 40 % 80 %. We observe that these requirements are well reached, with the BIAS found below 80% at all the sites and below 40% at 20 of the 25 sites. The provided TROPOMI systematic uncertainties are well in agreement with the observed biases at most of the stations except for the highest-HCHO-level site, where it is found to be underestimated. We find that while the BIAS has no latitudinal dependence, it is dependent on the HCHO concentration levels: an overestimation (C26-5 %) of TROPOMI is observed for very low HCHO levels (> 2:5-1015 molec. cm-2), while an underestimation (-30:8%-1:4 %) is found for high HCHO levels (>8:0-1015 molec. cm-2). This demonstrates the great value of such a harmonized network covering a wide range of concentration levels, the sites with high HCHO concentrations being crucial for the determination of the satellite bias in the regions of emissions and the clean sites allowing a small TROPOMI offset to be determined. The wide range of sampled HCHO levels within the network allows the robust determination of the significant constant and proportional TROPOMI HCHO biases (TROPOMI D C1:10-0:05-1015 C0:64-0:03 FTIR; in molecules per square centimetre). Second, the precision of TROPOMI HCHO data is estimated by the median absolute deviation (MAD) of the relative differences between TROPOMI and FTIR groundbased data. The clean sites are especially useful for minimizing a possible additional collocation error. The precision requirement of 1:2-1016 molec. cm-2 for a single pixel is reached at most of the clean sites, where it is found that the TROPOMI precision can even be 2 times better (0.5 0:8-1015 molec. cm-2 for a single pixel). However, we find that the provided TROPOMI random uncertainties may be underestimated by a factor of 1.6 (for clean sites) to 2.3 (for high HCHO levels). The correlation is very good between TROPOMI and FTIR data (R D 0:88 for 3 h mean coincidences; R D 0:91 for monthly means coincidences). Using about 17 months of data (from May 2018 to September 2019), we show that the TROPOMI seasonal variability is in very good agreement at all of the FTIR sites. The FTIR network demonstrates the very good quality of the TROPOMI HCHO products, which is well within the prelaunch requirements for both accuracy and precision. This paper makes suggestions for the refinement of the TROPOMI random uncertainty budget and TROPOMI quality assurance values for a better filtering of the remaining outliers.
AB - TROPOMI (the TROPOspheric Monitoring Instrument), on board the Sentinel-5 Precursor (S5P) satellite, has been monitoring the Earth s atmosphere since October 2017 with an unprecedented horizontal resolution (initially 7 km2-3:5 km2, upgraded to 5.5 km2-3:5 km2 in August 2019). Monitoring air quality is one of the main objectives of TROPOMI; it obtains measurements of important pollutants such as nitrogen dioxide, carbon monoxide, and formaldehyde (HCHO). In this paper we assess the quality of the latest HCHO TROPOMI products versions 1.1.(5-7), using ground-based solar-absorption FTIR (Fourier-transform infrared) measurements of HCHO from 25 stations around the world, including high-, mid-, and low-latitude sites. Most of these stations are part of the Network for the Detection of Atmospheric Composition Change (NDACC), and they provide a wide range of observation conditions, from very clean remote sites to those with high HCHO levels from anthropogenic or biogenic emissions. The ground-based HCHO retrieval settings have been optimized and harmonized at all the stations, ensuring a consistent validation among the sites. In this validation work, we first assess the accuracy of TROPOMI HCHO tropospheric columns using the median of the relative differences between TROPOMI and FTIR ground-based data (BIAS). The pre-launch accuracy requirements of TROPOMI HCHO are 40 % 80 %. We observe that these requirements are well reached, with the BIAS found below 80% at all the sites and below 40% at 20 of the 25 sites. The provided TROPOMI systematic uncertainties are well in agreement with the observed biases at most of the stations except for the highest-HCHO-level site, where it is found to be underestimated. We find that while the BIAS has no latitudinal dependence, it is dependent on the HCHO concentration levels: an overestimation (C26-5 %) of TROPOMI is observed for very low HCHO levels (> 2:5-1015 molec. cm-2), while an underestimation (-30:8%-1:4 %) is found for high HCHO levels (>8:0-1015 molec. cm-2). This demonstrates the great value of such a harmonized network covering a wide range of concentration levels, the sites with high HCHO concentrations being crucial for the determination of the satellite bias in the regions of emissions and the clean sites allowing a small TROPOMI offset to be determined. The wide range of sampled HCHO levels within the network allows the robust determination of the significant constant and proportional TROPOMI HCHO biases (TROPOMI D C1:10-0:05-1015 C0:64-0:03 FTIR; in molecules per square centimetre). Second, the precision of TROPOMI HCHO data is estimated by the median absolute deviation (MAD) of the relative differences between TROPOMI and FTIR groundbased data. The clean sites are especially useful for minimizing a possible additional collocation error. The precision requirement of 1:2-1016 molec. cm-2 for a single pixel is reached at most of the clean sites, where it is found that the TROPOMI precision can even be 2 times better (0.5 0:8-1015 molec. cm-2 for a single pixel). However, we find that the provided TROPOMI random uncertainties may be underestimated by a factor of 1.6 (for clean sites) to 2.3 (for high HCHO levels). The correlation is very good between TROPOMI and FTIR data (R D 0:88 for 3 h mean coincidences; R D 0:91 for monthly means coincidences). Using about 17 months of data (from May 2018 to September 2019), we show that the TROPOMI seasonal variability is in very good agreement at all of the FTIR sites. The FTIR network demonstrates the very good quality of the TROPOMI HCHO products, which is well within the prelaunch requirements for both accuracy and precision. This paper makes suggestions for the refinement of the TROPOMI random uncertainty budget and TROPOMI quality assurance values for a better filtering of the remaining outliers.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85088494513&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85088494513&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.5194/amt-13-3751-2020
DO - 10.5194/amt-13-3751-2020
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85088494513
SN - 1867-1381
VL - 13
SP - 3751
EP - 3767
JO - Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
JF - Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
IS - 7
ER -