Unresolved matters related to implantable cardioverter defibrillators: How can we avoid shock therapy?

Takashi Noda, Wataru Shimizu

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) have become very useful for patients with a high risk of sudden cardiac death, based on the results of several clinical trials. Although ICDs can improve survival when used in patients with heart failure (HF) and reduced left ventricular (LV) function, a recent subanalysis of major clinical trials regarding ICDs has revealed that ICD shock is associated with worsening HF or increase in mortality. ICD settings must be programmed appropriately, guided by clear evidence, to avoid unnecessary and inappropriate shocks. We discuss the benefits and pitfalls of ICD programming, such as tachycardia pacing, detection intervals, detection rates, and discriminators, to offer programming tips in this review.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)91-95
Number of pages5
Journaljournal of arrhythmia
Volume28
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012 Apr
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Algorithm
  • Appropriate shock
  • Implantable cardioverter defibrillator
  • Inappropriate shock
  • Programming

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Unresolved matters related to implantable cardioverter defibrillators: How can we avoid shock therapy?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this